Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wal-Mart's glow-in-the-dark mystery
The Toronto Star ^ | Feb 15, 2009 | Tyler Hamilton

Posted on 02/15/2009 9:15:56 AM PST by fanfan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

1 posted on 02/15/2009 9:15:56 AM PST by fanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cindy; Jeff Head; neverdem; GMMAC; Clive; exg; kanawa; backhoe; -YYZ-; Former Proud Canadian; ...

2 posted on 02/15/2009 9:17:01 AM PST by fanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

The religion of peace has no hand in this, I’m sure.


3 posted on 02/15/2009 9:18:43 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

They’ve been reconfigured as “Smoking Lamps” ~


4 posted on 02/15/2009 9:19:54 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Would this perhaps be a good time for all so-equipped FReepers to check their Trijicons and Meprolites? ;)


5 posted on 02/15/2009 9:25:35 AM PST by shoutingandpointing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

That evil Walmart strikes again. I’m sure that the next study will show that exposure to tritium causes people to have an uncontrollable urge to buy cheap Chinese products.


6 posted on 02/15/2009 9:25:49 AM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

A lot of smoke detectors contain tritium. The nite sights on my Glock contain tritium.


7 posted on 02/15/2009 9:26:06 AM PST by umgud (I'm really happy I wasn't aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Oh no, maybe this will kill all of us first.


8 posted on 02/15/2009 9:27:21 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

just what is the point? where are the missing signs?


9 posted on 02/15/2009 9:28:37 AM PST by rusureitflies? (OSAMA BIN LADEN IS DEAD! There, I said it. Prove me wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

So the tritium causes the exit sign to mysteriously disappear?


10 posted on 02/15/2009 9:30:36 AM PST by ThomasThomas ( Accept it, there is no except after in math.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
It is hard to get too excited about Tritium

It is impossible to contain but
It disperses naturally to water and dilutes rapidly

Low energy beta emitter, does not penetrate skin
minor risk for internal dosimetry

Perhaps is useful to scare people

11 posted on 02/15/2009 9:31:22 AM PST by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
Is tritium deadly?

Mine is!


12 posted on 02/15/2009 9:31:54 AM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution - 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rusureitflies?

The point is that the tritium could be used in a dirty bomb.


13 posted on 02/15/2009 9:32:05 AM PST by saganite (What would Sully do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rusureitflies?

BBL


14 posted on 02/15/2009 9:32:13 AM PST by fanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

If a terrorist wanted cause a massive expensive clean up in a Wal-Mart he would just knock over a CFB display.


15 posted on 02/15/2009 9:37:40 AM PST by ThomasThomas ( Accept it, there is no except after in math.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Probably on the walls of a bunch of teenagers bedrooms.


16 posted on 02/15/2009 9:38:25 AM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Isn’t Tritium used in real (not just “dirty”) nuclear weapons?

Why does this remind me of Iraq buying up a bunch of PlayStations to link together into a supercomputer ?


17 posted on 02/15/2009 9:39:45 AM PST by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812; TigersEye

ping


18 posted on 02/15/2009 9:40:50 AM PST by yorkie (Grandmas are antique little girls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

“The health effects of tritium exposure continue to be a hot topic of debate. It’s not strong enough to penetrate the skin, and in low quantities regulators and industry groups say tritium is safe. But when inhaled or ingested it can cause permanent changes to cells and has been linked to genetic abnormalities, developmental and reproductive problems and other health issues such as cancer.”

From what I read, after looking into the “T” on my Swiss Army watch with glow-in-the-dark hands, is that it only poses a threat when it is released into the atmosphere, is absorbed by moisture, and returns to the earth in rain and is ingested. I suppose there could be some other means of combining it with a water supply.


19 posted on 02/15/2009 9:41:12 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (The Stimulus Package: Preamble to the Democrat's new Declaration of In Dependence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Event Notification Report for January 30, 2009
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Operations Center

Event Reports For
01/29/2009 - 01/30/2009

MISSING TRITIUM EXIT SIGNS
WalMart N.H. ETC.

THIS MATERIAL EVENT CONTAINS A “LESS THAN CAT 3” LEVEL OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

SNIP* Sources that are “Less than IAEA Category 3 sources,” are either sources that are very unlikely to cause permanent injury to individuals or contain a very small amount of radioactive material that would not cause any permanent injury. Some of these sources, such as moisture density gauges or thickness gauges that are Category 4, the amount of unshielded radioactive material, if not safely managed or securely protected, could possibly - although it is unlikely - temporarily injure someone who handled it or were otherwise in contact with it, or who were close to it for a period of many weeks.

This source is not amongst those sources or devices identified by the IAEA Code of Conduct for the Safety & Security of Radioactive Sources to be of concern from a radiological standpoint. Therefore is it being categorized as a less than Category 3 source... http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/2009/20090130en.html


20 posted on 02/15/2009 9:41:23 AM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson