Skip to comments.
Climate change could be even worse than feared (Just what the left ordered, more fear and doom)
AFP on Yahoo ^
| 2/14/09
| Mira Oberman
Posted on 02/14/2009 6:25:29 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: headsonpikes
You too eh? I wasn’t going to tell anyone that God told me that.
To: Nathan Zachary
Let it be a secret between the three of us!
For now....
22
posted on
02/14/2009 7:07:14 PM PST
by
headsonpikes
(Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
To: NormsRevenge
Further complicating the problem is that higher temperatures could ... ignite tropical forests, potentially releasing billions of tons of carbon dioxide .. Well dang, we just need to start harvesting those tropical woods ASAP, before they all burn up. Putting them to good use is a form of sequestering their carbon content.
23
posted on
02/14/2009 7:14:13 PM PST
by
sionnsar
(IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5(SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|TaglineSpaceForRent)
To: NormsRevenge
It has been just over a year since the Nobel-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).... With this preamble to an article you just know what is to follow is pure unadulterated crap.
To: NormsRevenge
Again, the crowd attending the Global Warming Conference was mesmerized.
25
posted on
02/14/2009 7:14:49 PM PST
by
USAF70
(America is not 'governed' by the President or Congress. America is governed by the U.S.Constitution.)
To: Dutch Boy
Perfect and right on. More analysis from computer models?
26
posted on
02/14/2009 7:25:19 PM PST
by
1010RD
(First Do No Harm)
To: 1010RD
Nothing new at all; just a weekly reminder like the grocery store ads .
27
posted on
02/14/2009 7:33:40 PM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: Old Professer
You mean like, “We’re coming for you.”?
28
posted on
02/14/2009 7:40:32 PM PST
by
1010RD
(First Do No Harm)
To: NormsRevenge
Are you talking about the new ICE AGE?
Global warming ended in 1998, where have you been?
29
posted on
02/14/2009 7:45:49 PM PST
by
BillT
(New Executive Order to abolish the WS Constitution to be signed to save the US Constitution)
To: NormsRevenge; Defendingliberty; Genesis defender; WL-law; Normandy; TenthAmendmentChampion; FrPR; ..
30
posted on
02/14/2009 7:50:59 PM PST
by
steelyourfaith
(Hope + Change = PORKULU$)
To: 1010RD
No, just sort of like those “GOING OUT FOR BUSINESS” sales that take up white space.
31
posted on
02/14/2009 7:52:29 PM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: NormsRevenge
I think we need to take tree huggers and send them up there with the trees, Trees eat CO2 and produce O2, problem solved
32
posted on
02/14/2009 7:53:21 PM PST
by
Foolsgold
("We live in the greatest country in the world and I am going to change it" Barry O'boomarang 2008)
To: NormsRevenge
The more hysterical they become is an indication of the more irrational they are.
They are losing and they know it.
33
posted on
02/14/2009 8:01:24 PM PST
by
RedMonqey
(Arm yourself if you must. For your enemies surely will.)
To: An Old Man
34
posted on
02/14/2009 8:17:56 PM PST
by
razorback-bert
(Save the planet...it is the only known one with beer!)
To: NormsRevenge; steelyourfaith; All
The title should be “CO2 concentrations are greater than they expected”. The article isn’t about an underestimated global warming trends. Its about higher than expected CO2 concentrations. But that doesn’t grab headlines and government grants. They automaticly assume a connection between CO2 concentrations and global warming(hell they don’t even stick their necks out and call it global warming, leaving the door open in case we re-enter a new iceage I guess). They then go on to propose several doomsday scenarios of a very hot globe. The connection between CO2 concentrations and global warming hasn’t come close to being made. DON’T ACCEPT THE PREMISE that higher CO2 concentrations equal global warming.
35
posted on
02/14/2009 8:21:59 PM PST
by
Delacon
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
To: dabluesman
36
posted on
02/14/2009 8:23:01 PM PST
by
usslsm51
To: Volunteer
Ojmjakon, Russia, Monday’s low -76 F.
Toko, Russia, Thursday’s low -83 F.
I bet they would like a little gobal warming!
37
posted on
02/14/2009 8:27:14 PM PST
by
usslsm51
To: 1010RD
“Perfect and right on. More analysis from computer models?”
YES! Just like the computer models that predicted you’ll NEVER lose money on credit-default swaps!/s;)
To: Frank_2001
I get what you mean, but bad example.
It is true. I’ve never lost money on a CDS.;-]
39
posted on
02/14/2009 8:59:42 PM PST
by
1010RD
(First Do No Harm)
To: RedMonqey
They are losing and they know it.You are aware that Barak Obama is our President, the Dems control boht houses of Congress and Porkulus is poised to pass, right?
40
posted on
02/14/2009 9:03:57 PM PST
by
1010RD
(First Do No Harm)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
