Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777
All the decisions you mention in the Berg case were for applications for injunctions pending the Writ of Certiorari. Those were denied. However, in the original filing (08 -570 ) , the Writ of Certiorari before judgement was denied. That means it was sent back to the lower court. It is now working its way through the docket. If the lower court decides against Berg, it can still be appealed to SCOTUS.

08-570 BERG, PHILIP J. V. OBAMA, BARACK, ET AL. The motion of Bill Anderson for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is denied.

Donofrio and Cort were both applications for stays. They were denied on the old standby "standing ".

The Texas case and Washington State cases were denied because they were considered moot. When filed, they weren't moot, but by the time it got on the docket the clock had run out on what they were requesting.

None of these cases so far has been tried on the merits. They have all been dismissed on technicalities.

Berg currently has 3 suits pending - one of them is under seal by order of the court.There are a few more cases coming up that can't be dismissed as being moot or that the person doesn't have standing . ( Incidentally, the Keyes case filed an ammended complaint just to avoid the issue of it being deemed moot ).

I guess we will just have to agree to disagree on this issue. Only time will tell ....

195 posted on 02/18/2009 8:02:42 PM PST by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: TheCipher

Most of the court actions I listed for Berg were denials of his Petition for Writ of Certiorari and resubmissions of that Petition to different US Supreme Court Justices plus the original dismissal of Berg’s suit in the US District Court in Philadelphia.
Berg’s case has already been at the Supreme Court. He skipped the US Court of Appeals after Judge Surrick dismissed his claim and Berg went straight to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court told him that he could go back to the US Court of Appeals if we wanted to and try again. He is doing that.
Since the election, the certification of the electoral college vote and the swearing in have already taken place, the Supreme Court is NOT going to get involved, in my humble opinion.
The only way to remove a sitting president is via impeachment and conviction in the Pelosi-Reid controlled Congress, at least for the next two years.

There is really nothing to “disagree” on. I am simply advocating ADDING to any current or future civil actions a criminal investigation with a subpoens to release the original long form vault copy birth certificate.

It is my belief that would allow examination of the document by experts under cross-examination. I think that could be an effective way to get the bottom of the issue once and for all.


196 posted on 02/19/2009 8:15:18 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson