Replies

That was still a civil action (lawsuit). I’m talking about a criminal investigation for fraud/forgery with a prosecuting attorney (district attorney or state attorney general’s office) seeking the subpoena.
Whether it is a civil action or a criminal action doesn’t matter. The point was to get the BC. A subpoena is a subpoena - whether issued for a civil case or a criminal case.

District Attorneys and a state Attorney General’s office can often have a lot easier time getting a judge to grant a subpoena than a civil litigator.
Can you think of any reason why the Republican Attorney General of Hawaii has not attempted to get a subpoens? The Governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle campaigned for Senator McCain and spoke at the Republican National Convention.

It may be easier for a DA to get a subpoena issued but first someone has to bring a complaint for fraud and they have to be willing to prosecute it. I don't know why one hasn't . Maybe someone has brought a complaint and it is working its way through the channels. Having said that, DA's and Attorney Generals are all political creatures. Maybe they have reasons of their own not to do anything.

But you are off point of the first reason I answered you . You said :

I refuse to take any of the lawsuits seriously until someone at least TRIES to subpoena the document in question. Thus far no one has and therefore all these nuisance lawsuits will continue to get thrown out of court, as well they should

None of these lawsuits are criminal matters, so you were referring to the civil cases.When I called you out on it and pointed out that at least one of the civil cases has tried to subpoena the BC, you try to change the subject and start talking about criminal cases. Now since someone in the civil cases did try to subpoena the BC, will you stand by your word and take the cases seriously since someone has tried to subpoena the BC ?