Please point to which 2% they digest. Thanks.
How old are you todd? You act like a child- when the evidence gets too tough- you resort to childish insults? How ya doing with Nylonase problem? Turns out the bacteria could only ‘digest’ 2%, and by gosh by golly, that 2% that is digested is JUST LIKE their previous food sources structure-wise- woopsie Seems they aren’t ‘digesting nylon’ after all but only that part of hte structure that they were previously able to digest in protiens- Seems hte precoding was there after all, and al l it took was a frameshift to reactivate the ability to digest somethign they HAD digested i nthe past- TO simply said “They now have the ability to digest nylon- somethign that didn’t exist i nthe past” and made it sound liek the bacteria were digesting the whole nylon- seems TO can’t be relied on for ALL the FACTS and that htey HIDE these facts fro mthe public because it is detrimental to their petty anti-Creationists claims. Seems AIG was more right than TO said- once again. Wil lwe see a retraction andapology from TO? Not likely, they’d as soon poke htier own eyes out than admit anything.
Please point to which 2% they digest. Thanks.