Most peer-reviewed scientific journals, for starters.
LOL!!!!!!!!
So you think godless liberals leave science to science and somehow never ever hijack science to support their ideology and worldview like they do everything else from law to history to journalism to politics, AND that scientists are always objective for the most part?
Can you give us some, no ANY, manmade global warming objectivity?
algoreacle said the debate is over in this area as well, so since it is, this can only mean it’s no longer theory but fact or very close to it and virtually all scientists agree with the algoreacle.
This is fun, but we’re obviously not going to come to an agreement. You want to take the Bible as inerrant and literally true, word for word. Fine, that’s your choice. However, the Bible has been translated, re-translated, added to and subtracted from for millennia. The words that you cling to as factually infallible today may not even have existed in a version of the same book that was published 500 years ago. Christians can determine what is factual and what is allegorical given the history of the book and the context that modern science provides.
God gave us magnificent brains and the ability to solve puzzles. He would be sorely disappointed if we didn’t use those brains to figure out how he got us here. Christians of my perspective and outlook are clearly correct on this issue.