That document is just about 50% of D’onofrio’s case, ain’t it????
>>> That document is just about 50% of D’onofrio’s case, ain’t it????
The “NBC strategery” requiring NO birth certificate is Donofrio’s brainchild. However, going after the SOS was, in hindsight, perhaps a weak approach for SCOTUS standing. Even still, we found some weaknesses with the NJ SOS that can be exploited that I think were previously overlooked.
Part of the 1980 Soetoro divorce papers were revealed by Berg first on or about Dec 19 on his website. Orly had them shortly thereafter. BOTH too late to get them in front of the SCOTUS.
A research group I work with received the 1964 Obama divorce papers on Jan 2, and the remainder of BOTH 1980 and 1964 divorce papers on Jan. 8. SO, most of this stuff is very new and hadn’t been introduced into existing court cases.
These papers can be used to:
— establish that Obama Jr was IN FACT born to Obama Sr (a UK subject at Obama Jr’s birth)
— establish that Ann Dunham most likely LIED when she said she was in Hawaii TWO years prior to filing for divorce
- establish that Ann Dunham had motive and a pattern of lying about her children’s citizenship
— and other tidbits
Once the attorneys have their hands on:
— any Occidental College transcript records
— any adoption papers
— any passport records revealing citizenship (keep in mind that any records BEFORE Dec 2001 should reference the LONG FORM, because the Hawaii computerized “CertificaTION of Live Birth” didn’t exist before then)
— any birth registrations (NOT necessarily birth certificates) for Obama Jr _OR_ Obama Sr...
... it’ll be game over ;)