To: Michael Michael
because ALL CITIZENSHIP of the United States is defined by the Fourteenth Amendment
What about the relevant federal law under U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)? Casaelaw does play a role.
408 posted on
02/15/2009 9:32:05 PM PST by
Beckwith
(A "natural Born" citizen)
To: Beckwith
What about the relevant federal law under U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)? Casaelaw does play a role.
Only insofar as interpretation may go. It doesn't change the fact that citizenship of the United States comes exclusively from the Fourteenth Amendment.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson