Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael Michael
because ALL CITIZENSHIP of the United States is defined by the Fourteenth Amendment

What about the relevant federal law under U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)? Casaelaw does play a role.
408 posted on 02/15/2009 9:32:05 PM PST by Beckwith (A "natural Born" citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]


To: Beckwith
What about the relevant federal law under U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)? Casaelaw does play a role.

Only insofar as interpretation may go. It doesn't change the fact that citizenship of the United States comes exclusively from the Fourteenth Amendment.


436 posted on 02/15/2009 10:23:53 PM PST by Michael Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson