Senility: it's not a pretty sight.
Posted on 02/12/2009 8:40:25 PM PST by Syncro
It is dreadful that people of the Republican Party can even think of cooperating with these monsters.
The better thing for Morgan to do is to contact someone like Robert Rector and ask him to come up with some two to four sentence questions that she can ask. I’m not familiar with the fine points of the bill and neither is she. So, she needs to find someone who is and who can come up with those questions together with supporting material.
However, if she wants to ask someone about the field I deal with, here are some I submitted to BHO’s site (and then failed to find anyone else willing to vote them up):
http://24ahead.com/more-immigration-questions-barack-obama-changegov-open-quest
I’m with you. Was it an accident that oil prices were out of control in the short months leading up to the election, that the economy collapsed on the eve of the election, the fairness doctrine is looming, schools are programming our kids to be anti-American? I’ve always been skeptical about conspiracies but our current times are dark, and should be feared by true Americans.
He has obviously . . .
Allinsky, his other evil mentors . . .
sucked at the tit or worse of demonized folks for most, if not all, of his adult life.
He has gloried in their tutelage and grooming him as the main puppet in one of the closing chapters toward Armageddon.
He may have contributed a stray idea occasionally . . . but other than being a great puppet and orator . . . a la the likes of the German runt . . .
I think any substance he may have hidden under his skin is a black, gooey, stinky kind.
imho, you are exceedingly right about the evil forces, black forces hovering around . . . at least around . . . him.
BTW,
OTHER THAN SLAVISHLY AGREEING WITH THE MSM . . .
WHAT IS IT
with !!!!CONSERVATIVES!!!!
calling ENDLESS MULTIPLE SOURCES CONFIRMED
CONSPIRACY FACTS
“theory??????”
CRAZY!
Is the URL provided correct? The link reads: No such file (give_legacy_article)
Cheers,
OLA
So I flung open Specter’s back office door, and yelled like I was back in the country hollering for my dog. I yelled that I wanted to talk to somebody. Now!!! Specter’s chief of staff slinked out and gave us a few minutes of his time. We let him know that the country is angry, and we aren’t standing by as they decimate our Constitution and saddle our grandchildren with staggering debt.
Melanie Morgan is my kind of lady. I would have done the same darn thing! Good for you Melanie for your actions on all ends and for publishing these darn good and IMPORTANT questions. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you!!
INDEED! INDEED!
INDEED TO THE MAX!
If I had time, I would post this as a thread:
It continues at the link in the title.by Robert E. Rector and Katherine BradleyWebMemo #2287
A major public policy success, welfare reform in the mid-1990s led to a dramatic reduction in welfare dependency and child poverty. This successful reform, however is now in jeopardy: Little-noted provisions in the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate stimulus bills actually abolish this historic reform. In addition, the stimulus bills will add nearly $800 billion in new means-tested welfare spending over the next decade. This new spending amounts to around $22,500 for every poor person in the U.S. The cost of the new welfare spending amounts, on average, to over $10,000 for each family paying income tax.
Ending Welfare Reform
The welfare reform of 1996 replaced the old Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) with a new program named Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF). The key to welfare reform's reduction in dependency was the change in the funding structure of AFDC.[1]
Under the old AFDC program, states were given more federal funds if their welfare caseloads were increased, and funds were cut whenever the state caseload fell. This structure created a strong incentive for states to swell the welfare rolls. Prior to reform, one child in seven was receiving AFDC benefits.
When welfare reform replaced the old AFDC system with TANF, this perverse financial incentive to increase dependence was eliminated. Each state was given a flat funding level that did not vary whether the state increased or decreased its caseload. In addition, states were given the goal of reducing welfare dependence (or at least of requiring welfare recipients to prepare for employment).
The House and Senate stimulus bills will overturn the fiscal foundation of welfare reform and restore an AFDC-style funding system. For the first time since 1996, the federal government would begin paying states bonuses to increase their welfare caseloads. Indeed, the new welfare system created by the stimulus bills is actually worse than the old AFDC program because it rewards the states more heavily to increase their caseloads. Under the stimulus bills, the federal government will pay 80 percent of cost for each new family that a state enrolls in welfare; this matching rate is far higher than it was under AFDC.
A sad....BTTT....
Senility: it's not a pretty sight.
Goes especially well with $h!t sandwiches.
Yes, this is serious stuff and things are going to get worse before they get better. When people no longer think they can get redress through the system, when their leaders no longer listen to them, when their leaders actively work against them and conceal their true motives, then the stage is set for the type of outbreak you describe.
...that President Obama is misguided, ill-informed, and dangerously naive about terrorism,
Say it isn’t so?
Say it like you mean it.
say it like it has been said for years.
American cannot say it wasn’t warned.
Obamamania, is the sad result of BDS.
BDS and Obamamania are classic mental illness.
So, did Senator Sphincter ever call...?
D.C. Chapter Master Ping List
The Porkulus Bill is still alive. Keep up your calls, faxes and emails.
5.56mm
Even when Hannity pointed out all the bad stuff in there that Spector didn't know about, Spector kept saying “I tried to work with them. I was at the meeting. Where was everyone else.” And finally “I Gave My Word.”
Do you think “giving your word means a hill of beans to a Democrat?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.