Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
I would be very interested, with reservations... If in fact, the PAC's operations can be guaranteed to promote Conservatism, and only Conservatism (by it's actual definition), I would happily move my political contributions wholly into it, both time and money, and would meet that contribution with a contribution to FreeRepublic as well.

No offense, meant, but if that time and money would, through pragmatism's ugly designs, wind up in the campaign of the likes of Romney or McCain, I would just as soon continue contributing the way I am now, where every-single-red-cent supports Conservatives, and Conservative causes.

240 posted on 02/13/2009 1:30:07 AM PST by roamer_1 (Proud 1%er... Reagan Conservatism is the only way forward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: roamer_1; Jim Robinson

I would hope that any PAC developed is focused on finite objectives. Whether it be getting a few REAL conservatives in seats we can get (but have failed in the past...PRIMARIES), making sure our leaders are the best we can get or confronting the worst media offenders with boycotts of their advertisers, etc.

Something we can measure and review. There’s nothing worse than tossing money and just losing it. I’d much rather lose a few bad republicans than support a self-destructive party.

We have to have military-like procession. We have to have the input of our contributors and practical participation. The best best is use the most popular and practical ways forward, and to constantly be honest on whether we’re accomplishing our goals through our means.


297 posted on 02/13/2009 9:39:47 PM PST by Rick_Michael (Have no fear "President Government" is here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson