Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
Yes, they can lift things heavy things very well, but can they build the cutting edge, technologically advanced satellites really worth lifting?

Or are they going to chuck a bunch of 2002-caliber satellites up there?

54 posted on 02/12/2009 7:34:52 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: dead
Yes, they can lift things heavy things very well, but can they build the cutting edge, technologically advanced satellites really worth lifting? Or are they going to chuck a bunch of 2002-caliber satellites up there?

The state of technology has little to do with it. The Russian philosophy has always been "good enough to get the job done, and not much more."

If you want to talk about re-creating a satellite capability, the Russians are probably in the best position to do so.

The Russians built their massive spacelift capability precisely because they didn't have the same technology as us -- they made up for their technological shortcomings by being able to build and launch more, less-capable satellites instead.

In the process, they essentially wrote the book on space station operations, unmanned rendezvous, quick-turnaround low-cost launch, satellite mass-production, and many other impressive achievements.

59 posted on 02/12/2009 7:52:20 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson