Media diversity socialist translation: Stifle free speech
localism = censorship
1 posted on
02/12/2009 4:59:30 AM PST by
Man50D
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: bamahead
27 posted on
02/12/2009 8:55:48 AM PST by
EdReform
(The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
To: Man50D
Fine. Let’s just close it all down, radios for no one. The LIB stuff will fail just as it always has. We are not so desperate as to listen to the radio just ‘cause it’s there. Freakin’ morons.
To: EdReform; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
If markets cannot produce what society really cares about, like a media that reflects the true diversity and spirit of our country, then government has a legitimate role to play, he said.
Because the tax cheating, lobbyist coddling, elitist socialist buffoons in government reflect that 'diversity' and 'spirit' so damn well...of course. Are you kidding me?
Libertarian ping! Click
here to get added or
here to be removed or post a message here!
29 posted on
02/12/2009 9:08:07 AM PST by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: Man50D
“If markets cannot produce what society really cares about,..”
The mantra of every Marxist.
30 posted on
02/12/2009 9:13:36 AM PST by
CSM
(Smokers, the most patriotic of Americans!)
To: Man50D
All one needs to do is look at the nations ailing financial sector to understand that you cannot just proceed pell-mell in the happy notion that markets will solve all problems, Copps declared. 1. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are not "markets"; they are government entities designed to transfer mortgage risk to taxpayers. 2. Markets don't exist to solve problems or meet needs, but to exchange value and generate wealth. 3. The "airwaves" are not publicly-owned, but licensed. Public "ownership" of anything results in rationing, poor management, and bad quality; ask any ex-Communist. Too bad Obama's administration is not staffed by any ex-Communists.
31 posted on
02/12/2009 9:23:46 AM PST by
andy58-in-nh
(Ronald Reagan had a vision of America. Barack Obama has a vision of Barack Obama.)
To: Man50D
We already have that, it’s called changing the channel. It’s not our fault that their moonbats won’t listen to NPR and others.
32 posted on
02/12/2009 9:50:07 AM PST by
mojitojoe
(None are more hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free.)
To: Man50D
You want more diversity in broadcasting? Create more licensed channels for it!
If you don't do that, you are actually trying to decrease diversity.
33 posted on
02/12/2009 10:32:11 AM PST by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(Change is what journalism is all about. NATURALLY journalists favor "change.")
To: Man50D
This multi-culturalism and diversity push is getting out of hand. So, we’re not allowed to listen to someone who dissents unless we also listen to someone who toes the party line? What crap is that? I don’t want to listen to communists, because what they say is inherently bad. Will we see a situation where we have to look at porn in order to also look at a work of classical art? That’s where we’re heading.
34 posted on
02/12/2009 11:08:33 AM PST by
ronnyquest
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." -- Thomas Jefferson)
To: Man50D
COMRADE COPPS... Which part of CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW did you NOT understand at POLITICIAN SCHOOL???
This is USA not USSR.. and people like you Are not going to change it.
36 posted on
02/12/2009 1:50:40 PM PST by
gwilhelm56
(MULLAH OBAMA - which part of "Congress shall make no Law" - do you NOT UNDERSTAND??)
To: Man50D
no talk of doing this with TV or newspapers or NPR??
41 posted on
02/12/2009 4:16:16 PM PST by
GeronL
(please stand by...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson