Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Media diversity socialist translation: Stifle free speech

localism = censorship
1 posted on 02/12/2009 4:59:30 AM PST by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: Man50D

Does that mean you can change the channel on the radio? Is that what that dial is for? I doubt attendees and viewers of the Obama-Operah shows knew that. Maybe a government PSA would help them.

What we really need is more diversity on the TV channels, they all say the same thing, the same way.


2 posted on 02/12/2009 5:01:57 AM PST by Tarpon (If you don't stand on principle, you stand for nothing at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
“How do we ensure true localism in our broadcast environment..."

Localism is the stealth fairness doctrine.

3 posted on 02/12/2009 5:05:15 AM PST by torchthemummy (My apologies if this post retreads on ground already covered!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

““If markets cannot produce what society really cares about, like a media that reflects the true diversity and spirit of our country, then government has a legitimate role to play,” he said.”

What a !@(*# moron. If society really CARED about something on the radio, people would listen and markets would produce it endlessly because they’d be making money.

It’s called capitalism - a concept this pimple on the butt of my Government seems to have forgotten.


4 posted on 02/12/2009 5:05:44 AM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
government deciding what is good for you....what was known as choice has become change
5 posted on 02/12/2009 5:07:50 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
Copps, chosen by President Barack Obama to be acting chairman until a permanent replacementsomeone who's actually paid their taxes is named,

fixed it.

7 posted on 02/12/2009 5:14:16 AM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
“If markets cannot produce what society really cares about, like a media that reflects the true diversity and spirit of our country, then government has a legitimate role to play,” he said.

In other words, if the people don't agree with what the government sees as "diversity in media", the government reserves the right to bend the people to their will.

My frank opinion of this man would get me banned from FR.

8 posted on 02/12/2009 5:14:21 AM PST by MortMan (Power without responsibility-the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages. - Rudyard Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
yep talk radio.....but what about all the other media that supported the O. So clearly one sided...like all the leftist news papers, CNN, NBC, CBS etc. Ooooohhhh but those are ok....they tell the truth....yeh right! They want to govern talk radio because they are making money, and people are listing....leftist news papers are not. Next is the Internet.
9 posted on 02/12/2009 5:15:04 AM PST by nbhunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Note to the ‘Rats and TV advertisers: You can lead a viewer to the boob tube, but you can’t make him watch...


11 posted on 02/12/2009 5:16:49 AM PST by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Does this mean we’ll get a gay nuns on dope station?


12 posted on 02/12/2009 5:19:39 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

The incredible audacity of claiming that the financial markets were free to begin with is ridiculous. The financial crisis exists precisely because Government interfered with normal market forces... can you say CRA?


13 posted on 02/12/2009 5:20:38 AM PST by KenD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
So Copps wants to remove Hip Hop and replace it with Classical?

And Dianne Rheeme, or however she spells it ~ the old bat appears on 5 stations simultaneously in the WarshDC area ~ THAT'S ENTIRELY TOO MUCH!!!

I shall write Mr. Copps immediately and thank him for fixing it all up.

14 posted on 02/12/2009 5:25:37 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D; xcamel; steelyourfaith; neverdem; free_life; LibertyRocks; MNReaganite; ...
 
PETITION TO BLOCK CONGRESSIONAL
ATTACKS ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND PRESS
To: U.S. Congress, President of the United States, Supreme Court of the United States

Whereas, the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution clearly states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances";

Whereas, members of Congress are recently on record saying they want to re-impose the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" on U.S. broadcasters, or else accomplish the same goal of censoring talk radio by other means, and thereby establish government and quasi-government watchdogs as the arbiters of "fairness" rather than the free and open marketplace of ideas;

Whereas, the U.S. experimented with the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" for 38 years - from 1949 through 1987 - during which time it was repeatedly used by presidents and other political leaders to muzzle dissent and criticism;

Whereas, the abandonment of the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" in 1987, thanks to President Ronald Reagan, resulted in an unprecedented explosion of new and diverse voices and political speech - starting with Rush Limbaugh - that revitalized the AM radio band and provided Americans with a multitude of alternative viewpoints;

Whereas, talk radio is one of the most crucial components of the free press in America, and is single-handedly responsible for informing tens of millions of Americans about what their government leaders are doing;

Whereas, it is a wholly un-American idea that government should be the watchdog of the press and a policeman of speech, as opposed to the uniquely American ideal of a free people and a free press being the vigilant watchdogs of government;

Whereas, the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" - either under that name, or using a new name and even more devious methods - represents a frontal assault on the First Amendment, and its re-imposition would constitute nothing more nor less than the crippling of America's robust, unfettered, free press:

 

                                SIGN THE PETITION at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=87882

 
Freepmail me if you want to join my fairness doctrine ping list.

15 posted on 02/12/2009 5:25:43 AM PST by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Dear FCC Chair,

The fact that liberal ideas can not survive the light of day is not the fault of the free market or conservatives, and as such, requires no federal remedy.

And on Lincon’s birthday, it is worth noting that, “...you can not build up little men by tearing down big men.”


16 posted on 02/12/2009 5:28:16 AM PST by G Larry (Obama care means dying in line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

If this guy weren’t so reflective of the fascist mentality of the Obama administration, he might understand that the EASIEST WAY to ensure “diversity” of opinion is to make it easier to start new radio stations. Someone locally wanted to start a station, and it took almost a year to get all the regulatory approval, while paying rent and other expenses waiting and waiting.


19 posted on 02/12/2009 5:41:06 AM PST by wildandcrazyrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

The liberals had their shot at talk radio — it just fails every time they try it. I’d love to see them try to take on Rush, Savage, Levin, Hannity, etc. and stifle free speech. Not to mention lost revenue to the station owners.


20 posted on 02/12/2009 5:43:27 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

People still think of radio in 1970s terms. Any Censorship doctrine will create an endless network of floating, unlicensed radion stations that will flood the airwaves with conservative talk. All you need is a van, a transmitter, and WiFi access. Alternately, a memory stick or CD and 42 cents postage. What Obama needs to worry about are floating jammers. Same van, less trouble, jamming Marxist Radio as they roll through every town in the country. Technology makes a Fairness Doctrine obsolete.


22 posted on 02/12/2009 6:29:10 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
“If markets cannot produce what society really cares about, like a media that reflects the true diversity and spirit of our country, then government has a legitimate role to play,”

What makes this clown think that society is unhappy with the radio?

23 posted on 02/12/2009 6:33:26 AM PST by BenLurkin (Mornie` utulie`. Mornie` alantie`.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Translation: The name, “Fairness Doctrine” has negative connotations, so when we reinstate it, we will call it something else.


24 posted on 02/12/2009 6:33:45 AM PST by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
Big difference was that during the 1950s most of us had at most three TV networks to watch and only a handful of radio stations. Now with cable and Internet news sources our choices are huge and far more diverse than when Uncle Walter Cronkheit told us "That's the way it is" each night.

I am especially wary of FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstien who got his appointment through Tom Daschle. Adelstien is a staunch advocate of taxing Internet access to give it way free to the "under served" as well as re-imposing the "Fairness Doctrine".

25 posted on 02/12/2009 6:58:44 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

Fairness Docterine bump for later.........


26 posted on 02/12/2009 7:07:27 AM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson