I’m not berating women for the fact they primarily are driven by feelings and emotion. That’s how most of them are designed by God to be. They are the complement to the man, who is driven primarliy by logic and reason (again except for our metrosexual wimps). But government is not set up to be charity or welfare, it is best when it does the least (defense, justice systems, citizen safety).
Google “Sockdolager” and you will find out exactly what I mean. Using government to “help” people - ie welfare, pay them money for things, to give the money collected from some to other people to take care of them - that is an idea that inherently appeals to the nature of a woman. Because it is about feelings, taking care of people who are in trouble, using government to do it rather than the private institutions that should be doing it - family, volunteers, private charities, private groups, churches. When we all sit back and say government can do it we give government power it should not have and allow it to do “charity” - something government never had the authority to do in the first place - check the Constitution. It’s not in there.
Man in driven primarily by logic and reason? Then how do you explain Clinton? What was his primary drive? It certainly wasn't above his waist.