Skip to comments.
CBO: TARP Executive-Pay Limits Would Cost Treasury $10.9 Billion Over 10 Yrs
Dow Jones Newswires ^
| Feb. 10, 2009
Posted on 02/11/2009 5:15:59 PM PST by Wolfie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
1
posted on
02/11/2009 5:15:59 PM PST
by
Wolfie
To: Wolfie
Law of unintended consequences. Ridiculous the Dems would prefer to punish executives than reap more taxes. Appalling!
To: originalbuckeye
On the other hand, I can’t help but wonder what revenues have been lost by offshoring jobs. But I bet the Dow Jones Newsire’s not worried abou that.
3
posted on
02/11/2009 5:24:52 PM PST
by
Wolfie
Minimum wage meet Maximum Wage.
Welcome, comrade.
To: Wolfie
Congress is populated with some seriously stupid people.
5
posted on
02/11/2009 5:26:53 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: originalbuckeye
Unless they pay the money back...they would be using taxpayer money...we would be paying the whole thing. It’s cheaper to lose the taxes then pay the entire amount...whoever wrote this article is a fool. Not that these guys pay taxes...they have all sorts of tax loopholes.
6
posted on
02/11/2009 5:27:34 PM PST
by
bronxboy
To: Wolfie
The more capable people would simply take jobs at other companies.
Any stockbroker who brings in four or five million a year in revenue can easily get a job anywhere for a million a year. That is the truth Congress doesn’t want to recognize.
To: bronxboy
I’m thinking we just give $100,000 a year to everbody on welfare. Think of the taxes we’d collect!
8
posted on
02/11/2009 5:28:32 PM PST
by
Wolfie
To: Wolfie
A situation encouraged by Congresscritters who wish to make companies “pay their fair share” with one of the highest corporate income tax rates in the Western world.
9
posted on
02/11/2009 5:28:36 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: proxy_user
10
posted on
02/11/2009 5:29:22 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Wolfie
People who make 100,000 pay taxes...it’s not enough to take advantage of the loophole...most between 75,00 and say 250,00 pay the bulk of taxes.
11
posted on
02/11/2009 5:31:32 PM PST
by
bronxboy
To: proxy_user
Hit the pavement Jack...be sure to put on your resume...made risky stupid loans and bankrupted the country...plenty of takers, I’m sure.
12
posted on
02/11/2009 5:32:35 PM PST
by
bronxboy
To: Army Air Corps
Yes, but they don’t pay the taxes as they have lots of tax goodies to make sure they don’t...there stupid bonuses are tax deductible. You think they have been donating to Congress for no reason?
13
posted on
02/11/2009 5:33:40 PM PST
by
bronxboy
To: bronxboy
I guess you didn’t read the whole post. They take their rich customers with them when they leave, and their new brokerage house gets the revenue.
If you are that kind of stockbroker, you are a top salesman who can work anywhere.
To: proxy_user
Do these guys still have rich customers, and I did read the article...I’m more impressed with a local banker who makes responsible loans and is helping out his community in a responsible way...these guys are shysters as we say in New York.
15
posted on
02/11/2009 5:38:11 PM PST
by
bronxboy
To: proxy_user
16
posted on
02/11/2009 5:40:46 PM PST
by
bronxboy
To: bronxboy
IIRC the September bailout was sold to the American people as loans that would be paid back with interest. So, yes the money that was given out in the initial installment was to be paid back and we were supposed to make money on the deal. I believe that Geithner, Paulson, Bernanke and some guy named Neil or something, Democrats all, were in charge of the distribution so blaming the Bush Administration is just more of Zero's lying. And, Bronxboy, ask New York state how much they've lost in tax revenues due to the lifting of bonuses in their state.
To: originalbuckeye; bronxboy
IIRC the September bailout was sold to the American people as loans that would be paid back with interest. So, yes the money that was given out in the initial installment was to be paid back and we were supposed to make money on the deal.
By that logic, we should force the execs to double their compensation, so we could lend more and get more principal, interest, and income tax back.
18
posted on
02/11/2009 6:04:12 PM PST
by
kenavi
(Want a real stimulus? Drill!)
To: Army Air Corps
As are the executive halls of the biggest banks.
These whining crybabies should have been smart enough to know taking Gov’t money would equal this. Plus they pretty much all backed Obama in the election. eff ‘em.
19
posted on
02/11/2009 6:09:02 PM PST
by
Boiling Pots
(Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious)
To: kenavi
I am not advocating that. I'm just saying that the money was given, with no strings attached at that time, and if the can pay the money back with interest, what business is it of our where it went? Now, they will have to pay it back with interest. We were told we would MAKE money on the September bailout. The stimulus is nothing but the Barack 0bama Reparations Bill to Benefit those who Contributed to the 0bama Campaign. This money WON'T be paid back with interest; it won't be paid back at all!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson