Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

This is unconstitutional, the District of Columbia is not a state. To amend the Constitution, it must pass a 2/3 approval in both the House and Senate and be ratified by 3/4 of the legislatures of the 50 states.


41 posted on 02/11/2009 9:23:37 AM PST by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TommyDale

A constitutional amendment was drawn up on this very subject in 1978, to give the District of Columbia congressional representation. It was ratified by far less than the 38 states required. It was passed by 2/3 of each house of Congress, but not enough states ratified it.

This is absurd. Back in 1978, people realized and accepted that a constitutional amendment was needed to accomplish what they are trying to do. But now, in 2009, the Obamaniacs figure that their Dem. majorities in Congress are enough.

How can this be? If it required an amendment in 1978, it still requires an amendment now, because the legal status of D.C. has not changed since then.


66 posted on 02/11/2009 10:12:29 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson