Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

D.C. Voting Rights Passed by Senate Committee
Washington Post ^ | Wednesday, February 11, 2009; 11:02 AM

Posted on 02/11/2009 8:58:36 AM PST by Perdogg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-155 next last
To: JSDude1

I don’t think Alabama wants to be divided into two states.


101 posted on 02/11/2009 12:57:52 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

Careful.

There are people on FR who worship Rush Limbaugh every bit as reverently as a lot of Dems worship “The One”.

Personally, I am suspicious of ANYONE who puts TAHT much stock in what ONE person says/thinks.


102 posted on 02/11/2009 1:03:09 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Exactly right. Rewarding bad behavior is stupid.
The R’s would have rubber stamped every stupid thing McCain proposed had he won.
We at least have a chance of righting the ship. Had McCain won there would be no chance of that.

The Kool-Aid drinkers don’t have friggin clue.


103 posted on 02/11/2009 1:58:01 PM PST by arealconservativeforachange (Tell JD Hayworth to run for McCain's seat! http://www.jdhayworth.com/contact.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
And the hits just keep on coming...

I wonder if anyone cares or even notices?

The one issue conservatives and other disgruntled Republicans who voted for BHO or stayed home last NOV have got no one to thank but themselves for what is happening.

The Democrats are in the process of establishing themselves as the PERMANENT MAJORITY PARTY.

The executive branch take over of the upcoming census and this DC voter initiative not to mention the government takeover of banks and big business just solidifies the GOP to Minority Party status for generations to come and WE are powerless to stop them.

104 posted on 02/11/2009 2:21:31 PM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; All

“DC has had no vote for two centuries.” I think that when DC was originally excluded from voting representation there was a very small population of non government people. Now, DC has as much population as several small states. Is it really fair to say that tax paying citizens of the US should be denied any voting representation, now and forever? Perhaps the thing to do would be to charge DC residents 1/2 income tax, as they have a vote for President and Vice President, but no voting Congresspeople or Senators.


105 posted on 02/11/2009 2:23:58 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
I think that when DC was originally excluded from voting representation there was a very small population of non government people. Now, DC has as much population as several small states. Is it really fair to say that tax paying citizens of the US should be denied any voting representation, now and forever? Perhaps the thing to do would be to charge DC residents 1/2 income tax, as they have a vote for President and Vice President, but no voting Congresspeople or Senators.

None of that makes this proposed legislation any less Unconstitutional. In 1978, the Congress submitted a proposed Constitutional amendment to the States. The proposal would have granted DC full representation in the House and the Senate. It only got 16 ratifications. Maybe a proposal which only dealt with DC representation in the House would have better luck.

106 posted on 02/11/2009 2:42:19 PM PST by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I wonder how those ‘conservatives’ who stayed home in 2006 and 2008 feel now?

They washed their hands; they feel clean as the rats soil our republic.

107 posted on 02/11/2009 2:44:17 PM PST by Jacquerie (More Central Planning is not the solution to the failure of Central Planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

ok, that was my memory .. in our then newly gerrymandered CD, the Dem Congresswoman voted for DC to have that vote. At a town meeting *someone* asked how that helped OUR cd and she couldn’t answer. The R beat her in Nov.


108 posted on 02/11/2009 3:12:54 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Constitution?
A socialist, totalitarian regime doesn't use a constitution. They just take over everything and the peasants are forced to obey.
Welcome to Oboma world.

The Obama BOHICA Chronicles Chapter 2.

109 posted on 02/11/2009 3:21:51 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: arealconservativeforachange

That’s exactly right. Conservative R congressionals are boxed in(forced) to liberalism when the republican president proposes something that they’d oppose if it were a D proposing it.

We’re going to go through an incredibly hard four years. There is absolutely no doubt about it.

But right now we have a fighting chance. With McCain, we’d have been sunk by “our own president’s” liberal policies and nothing to stop it. The R would *HAVE* to have signed on, and of course D would’ve been more than happy.


110 posted on 02/11/2009 3:22:46 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (Undercut Microsoft: Use Linux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
“DC has had no vote for two centuries.” I think that when DC was originally excluded from voting representation there was a very small population of non government people. Now, DC has as much population as several small states. Is it really fair to say that tax paying citizens of the US should be denied any voting representation, now and forever?

Very fair. No representation is fine with me. If DC wasn't overwhelmingly Black this would be a non issue. Democrats are trying to inject a racial angle. I had relatives in DC. I never heard them complain about lack of representation

111 posted on 02/11/2009 3:25:33 PM PST by dennisw (Archimedes--- Give me a place to stand, and I will move the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Experiment 6-2-6
And don't forget us folks down here in American Samoa, either!

Why stop there? Why not a seat for every US Embassy across the globe?

112 posted on 02/11/2009 3:30:57 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Number One - nobody has to live in DC right now. The award-winning Metro is widely regarded as the best mass-transit system in the country.

Number Two - if this was anything other than a naked power grab, Congress would solve the “fairness” and “taxation without representation” problems by ceding all residential and commercial land in the District back to Maryland and Virginia, perhaps with some take-back provision within the 10-mile square for future expansion,leaving the District effectively a Federal campus with no more permanent residents than are found in the Fidelity Investments campus here in Merrimack, NH.

You’d have North Washington, Maryland, and South Washington, Virginia. Ta-da, all done, no raping of the Constitution necessary.

But that approach wouldn’t increase the power of Democrats in Congress, so it’ll be a cold day in hell before they do anything like that.


113 posted on 02/11/2009 3:37:58 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

He also claimed, even more laughably, that Willard Romney was a conservative.


114 posted on 02/11/2009 4:16:06 PM PST by manapua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
No, I don't. I just recall that he mentioned at least several times on air...

Then you should have no problems finding one video or audio recording of him making that claim should you?

...during the primaries how conservative W was. I recall his telling of private conservations with prominent people who knew W personally, and that people would be surprised. Other Freepers have shared this recollection in other posts.

Honestly I don't care if God Himself shared his "recollection" confirming what you are saying Rush said. Without an actual transcript, video or auto record of him stating that GWB was a Conservative all you have is assumptions based on hearsay.
I also listen to Rush and have NEVER, EVER heard him state that he believed that GWB was a conservative. I have heard him say that he knew others that believed GWB to be a conservative and that he believed GWB to be "more conservative than" either "Gore" or "Kerry", but he (Rush) has, to my knowledge, ever endorsed the view that Bush is a "Conservative."

Feel free to prove me wrong.

Thx!

115 posted on 02/11/2009 4:17:26 PM PST by The Anti-One (So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Boiling Pots
In hindsight, (considering the GOP Congress)> Al Gore would have been a better choice, only because we would have had gridlock

Well let's see. Multiple 9/11's. Libya still a threat. Hussein still in Iraq. Larger entitlement spending. Reduction in the military. Environmentalism run amuck. Embryonic stem cell research funding. Exec orders out the wazoo. No. I don't believe Al Gore would have been an improvement.

116 posted on 02/11/2009 4:47:38 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Nationalized economy? Economic ruin? Debt?

Although George Bush was very much “anti-terrorist” he lacked focus on the most dangerous threat (Jihad and Shariah).

Any psychopath with a political motive can be a terrorist, but it takes a committed Muslim to be a Jihadist.

Islam has made great leaps and bounds on the ground in America in the last 8+ years.


117 posted on 02/11/2009 4:55:24 PM PST by Boiling Pots (Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Boiling Pots

and you think Al Gore would have been better?


118 posted on 02/11/2009 5:41:15 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

My point was that he could have been less worse by virtue of a GOP Congress. The same one that neutered slick willy to a degree. Bush, otoh, ran completely amok with new spending programs.


119 posted on 02/11/2009 6:00:44 PM PST by Boiling Pots (Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
A Senate committee approved a bill today that would give the District its first full seat in the House of Representatives, setting up a crucial vote by the full chamber sometime in coming months. The Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee passed the legislation 11 to 1 at its first business meeting in the new Congress. The lone "no" vote was cast by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the 2008 Republican presidential nominee.
Battles -- choose wisely. Stimulus!

Thanks Perdogg!
120 posted on 02/11/2009 6:10:32 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson