==Seems a bit disingenuous of the author to state that “Darwinists today seek to stifle scientific dissent” when the ID side pretty much eschews scientific research.
That Darwinists today seek to stifle scientific dissent is a demonstrable fact:
http://www.slaughterofthedissidents.com/index.php?p=20case_studies
“is a demonstrable fact”
One that gets player out in this website everyday.
You mean people should keep their jobs when they don’t do what they’ve been hired to do?
That Darwinists today seek to stifle scientific dissent is a demonstrable fact:
_________
OK. Point me to a place where I can read the scientific dissent related to, say, irreducible complexity, you know, one of the topics mentioned in this thread that you have posted. Note that the request is for the scientific dissent, not philosophical. I’m pretty clear on the latter.
There is no try; only do.
Looking forward to seeing Alabama, Texas, et al in court. Soon.