Darwin was not a scientist. Nor did he follow the scientific method. He was a med-school dropout turned amateur naturalist. Origin of Species was largely devoid of scientific evidence. It was nothing more than a long argument advocating a complete reinterpretation of biological history based on minor variations between finches.
yea, natural historian is probably the better term.
“Origin of Species was largely devoid of scientific evidence.”
Oh and intelligent design is chock full of it? Right.
“Darwin was not a scientist. Nor did he follow the scientific method. He was a med-school dropout turned amateur naturalist.” [excerpt]You forgot trained theologian.