Good morning!
There is nothing wrong with celebrating Darwin, he was an important scientist and a nice guy to boot. I would agree that the neo-Darwinists have gone WAY overboard with it all the reverence. The most important progress in evolutionary biology happened in the last 50 years. Darwin and Wallace simply set the stage for the modern synthesis.
Ah, the positing of irreducibly complexity as an argument for ID and against evolution.
I note with interest that no peer-reviewed scientific study accompanies the positing of irreducible complexity.
Why do you think that is?
Seems a bit disingenuous of the author to state that “Darwinists today seek to stifle scientific dissent” when the ID side pretty much eschews scientific research.
What is intellegent design?
Casey Luskin. Wasn’t he present in Dover when the judge determined that ID isn’t science and is a form of creationism in disguise?