Is not the RNA in question tanscribed from DNA?
It seems that it is your claim that this RNA after being transcribed from DNA that is more similar between humans and chimps, is then spliced and diced such that it would be more similar between chimps and gorillas.
So you are not claiming (apparently) that the spliced RNA nontranslated transcripts of chimps and gorillas will be more similar, but that is not only quite an illogical stretch not based upon any data, it is also a far cry from your assertion that the DNA similarity between humans and chimps being greater than ether's similarity with gorillas was a “logical impossibility” and “B.S.”.
Holy moving goal posts Batman!
Are you now willing to admit that my assertion that humans and chimps are more similar in DNA than either is to a gorilla is not “B.S.” or a “logical impossibility” but a clear fact based upon the data?