If I go back to your original prediction I will note that you said it was a “logical impossibility” for humans and chimps to be more similar than chimps and gorillas.
Obviously when comparing DNA sequences in either genetic regions, non genetic regions, or over an ENTIRE CHROMOSOME or two; humans and chimps are much more similar to each other than either is to a gorilla.
Denying the data at this point just makes you look like a simpleton.
For some reason you are failing to grasp that the linear DNA sequence does not explain why chimps are closer in body plan and functional needs to the other great apes (and no, I do not subscribe to the Evo ASSUMPTION that humans are members of the great ape family). Thus the fact that chimps are closer to the other apes than to humans MUST be due to something other than linear DNA. I’m predicting that it will be explained by the non-translated regions which can produce five, seven or more functionally DIFFERENT trancripts from just one segment of code.