Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mamelukesabre

“No engines means no hydraulics”

I totally dispute this assertion. Of course there are hydraulics, no design would be foolish enough to make that all dependent on engine systems.


12 posted on 02/08/2009 6:57:42 PM PST by George from New England (escaped CT 2006; now living north of Tampa Bay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: George from New England
“No engines means no hydraulics”

I totally dispute this assertion. Of course there are hydraulics, no design would be foolish enough to make that all dependent on engine systems.

That's it in a nutshell ....no designer would be foolish enough to make flight controls dependent on engine operation. All engines do is provide forward motion...the airplane will fly without them...not for long...but fly perfectly fine. In this case it was one huge glider.

Signed: Freeper, pilot and aircraft mechanic

56 posted on 02/08/2009 7:48:04 PM PST by Niteflyr ("If youÂ’re drawing flak, you know you're over the target".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson