Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Riodacat

“.....is stating well known scientific facts about the age of things now considered to be offensive to religious belief.”

You’re scientific facts assume too much. You assume the star was created/formed before the light of the star. It’s a reasonable assumption I guess, but still an assumption and not proof of an old universe. You also assume the light has always traveled at the same rate. That’s a small minded assumption. Your assumptions aren’t science. The existence of those assumptions in the minds of otherwise scientific people shows an agenda at worst, and at best, a blind spot.


86 posted on 02/09/2009 6:08:09 AM PST by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: demshateGod
You’re scientific facts assume too much. You assume the star was created/formed before the light of the star. It’s a reasonable assumption I guess, but still an assumption and not proof of an old universe. You also assume the light has always traveled at the same rate. That’s a small minded assumption. Your assumptions aren’t science. The existence of those assumptions in the minds of otherwise scientific people shows an agenda at worst, and at best, a blind spot.

You're now 2 for 2. Congrats.
If ignorance is bliss, you gotta be one happy puppy..

89 posted on 02/09/2009 7:01:45 AM PST by Riodacat (Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson