Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts
Both models rely on historical interpretation.

The Universe is currently observable. The New Testament is at best, a second account written several years after what some people may have observed.

72 posted on 02/08/2009 9:17:33 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62

==The Universe is currently observable.

Quite true. The Universe is currently observable by scientists who subscribe to both models. And your point is?


73 posted on 02/08/2009 9:29:09 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62; GodGunsGuts

GGG was talking about interpretation.

Sure the universe is currently observable and people write down what they observe, just like you say the ancients did.

If the writings of the authors of the NT are to be discredited because of what they may have observed, that should hold true for ALL accounts of anything. Recording it as it happens is no guarantee of increased accuracy anyway.


109 posted on 02/09/2009 9:56:00 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson