Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cringing Negativism Network
"She was pointing it at the photographer. Unless the camera was somehow set to a remote shutter - there is NO excuse for pointing a weapon at another person."

Which of your scenarios do you presume? If the former, please tell us as to what part the photographer had in the photo shot. Was the photographer a firearms hobbyist? If so, did he or she talk the subject of the photo into posing? Is he a gunsmith, and did he check the firearm before telling her to pose with it? Is the firearm capable of firing rounds?

...so many mindreaders and answers, so little testimony or evidence. It is most healthy to assume that the weapon was not capable of firing a round at the time of photo, and parents and school administrators are pathological for considering terminating anyone for that.


29 posted on 02/07/2009 10:42:30 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: familyop

Simple safely rule to avoid any confusion:

Assume all weapons, are always, loaded and off “safe”.

Behave appropriately!

Never. Never point a weapon at another person. Unless they are threatening you.

For any reason.

Even representing that act, is wrong.


30 posted on 02/07/2009 10:46:24 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (During any "d" administration: USA's msm, become indistinguishable from the ussr's pravda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson