I really find it difficult to understand why you insist on insulting the elite few that can grasp the global warming concept. If you had any intelligence you would clearly see the correlation that any temperature fluctuations, or stagnation are the result of global warming. It only gets worse by the hour. Just 5 hours ago we were blanketed in global warming and it was 5pm, it is now 10pm and its definatly colder mainly because of global warming.
I hope you can get your pea brain wrapped around this before its too late. Even 10am will be too late, by then we will be in the middle of global warming and temperatures will be rising, by 6pm the global warming will be so awful that the temperatures will be dropping.
/sarc
I love this part:
Existence of the Greenland civilization is a source of embarrassment to the global warmers as it leads to a logical inconsistency:
Q. Was Greenland warmer during the period 950 A.D. to 1450 A.D. than it is today?
A. Without question. Crops and pastures were grown where today is permanently frozen ground.
Q. Could this be a localized temperature anomaly?
A. Only if such an anomaly can stay around for approximately 500 years.
Q. Were port cities such as London and Venice flooded by high sea levels during this period of high temperatures — temperatures several degrees higher than today?
A. No. [The Tower of London was built in 1078 A.D. on the north bank of the River Thames, a few feet above the high tide mark. Today it remains a few feet above the high tide mark.]
Q. So why would one expect them to be flooded today if temperatures rose considerably, to the level that would allow agriculture again in Greenland?
A. Duh. Because Al Gore said so?
“I never was a very good english student”
What you meant to say was that you were never a good student of english. Unless, of course, you were schooled in England. ;)