Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vaquero

Ha ha....a denier.

That is a lot of chutzpah to deny that most slavers were Yankee.

Sad fact.

That my kin bought the majority of the chattel...true.

It was a complimentary relationship

at least I know then truth when I see it unlike a freeper besmirching an otherwise fine Ruger..

next you’ll swear there were no cotton factors up north

*how can conservatives be so ignorant


152 posted on 02/07/2009 12:52:27 PM PST by wardaddy (I'm for Sarah. Nuff said, you either get it or you don't. Enjoy Steele, he's no Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: wardaddy
because capitalist had carte blanch from the Crown to make a few bucks only condemns the few ship owners and venture capitalists to trade rum for slaves, slaves for molasses and molasses for Rum.

but I only know from reading about these things...because my fore bearers were sunning themselves (in squalor) in southern Europe while all this was going on....and didn't arrive till the early 1900’s.

160 posted on 02/07/2009 1:02:34 PM PST by Vaquero ( "an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson