Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dosa26

Nope...they say it will be solid state. I can understand that for the Navy version...but wonder where the Army one will get its power from.


19 posted on 02/06/2009 11:08:10 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head

Freakin’ awsome news for new navy carriers then. I wonder if the military has some new small design nuclear generators they aren’t talking about. That could change the world Maybee as much as the steam engine did.


21 posted on 02/06/2009 11:17:04 PM PST by Dosa26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
but wonder where the Army one will get its power from

Sheer speculation here, but this might be part of the reason the Army is investigating hybrid drive trains. The vehicle carrying the system may not by very mobile while firing and rate of fire may be less than that of the Navy version, but it will probably work. The other option that springs to mind is the base grid, if the system is being deployed in stationary settings.

23 posted on 02/07/2009 2:35:11 AM PST by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Electric laser from a power generator.

Electric lasers can readily extract their power from a generator. OTOH, chemical lasers have to use chemical reactions from liquid chemicals stored in pressurized tanks.


28 posted on 07/11/2009 4:38:24 AM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson