Considering that California is a community property state, in what way are these ‘her husband’s tax problems’, and not ‘her tax problems’? We aren’t seriously saying that she’s the ‘little woman who didn’t know what her husband was doing’, are we?
here’s what Gibbs said about Solis-Sayyed:
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Solis should not be held accountable for her husband’s business. “Her husband had an issue,” Gibbs said of Solis, a California Democrat. “She’s not a partner in that business. We’re not going to penalize her for her husband’s business mistakes.”
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-02-05-solis-husband-taxes_N.htm
according to the USA Today article, Sayyed also owes for Fire Dept liens for county fees, as well as state sales tax liens, over and above state business tax liens.
Yeah I wonder if they typed that with a straight face.
It’s not that the thug picked a 5th tax cheat in his quest to turn the country into Chicago.
It’s just her husband has some problems but they’ll be straightened out and we can confirm her and never mention it again.
Think if there were an (R) involved they’d have “fraud”, “dodged”, “misled”, etc in every sentence?