Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic

4.5 billion isnt hard to accept, if it were true, but the plain normal reading of genesis and the evidence supports six days better.


61 posted on 02/05/2009 8:17:31 PM PST by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: raygunfan
4.5 billion isnt hard to accept, if it were true, but the plain normal reading of genesis and the evidence supports six days better.

What evidence is there to support the theory that what appears to be 4.5 billion years worth of uranium decay happened in less than 6000 years, without releasing the amount of heat that should have been associated with that decay?

80 posted on 02/06/2009 3:37:01 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: raygunfan
4.5 billion isnt hard to accept, if it were true, but the plain normal reading of genesis and the evidence supports six days better.

Actually, neither support the concept of a young earth. Here's a short word study I did on the yom, the main word that YECs rely on for their Biblical interpretation. It also links to refutations of some of the "scientific" claims for a young earth.

The simple fact is that all of the scientific evidence points to an old universe and old earth, and this evidence agrees perfectly with the Bible.

115 posted on 02/06/2009 9:33:37 AM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson