To: Concho
Thanks for the site. I had not seen some of these photos. F8 is interesting. I am an anesthesiologist with extensive experience with trauma and gunshot wounds. This photo appears to confirm what I said in my post. Only with the reconstructed face, the "death stare" photo, is one lead to believe otherwise, and then only because of the labels on the photo. I am supposing that the labels were added by someone trying to suggest a front bullet entry. It does not look that way to me
Oh well.
271 posted on
02/05/2009 12:21:38 PM PST by
outofstyle
(There's a rake at the gates of Hell tonight)
To: outofstyle
There are some in respectable positions who believe that these photos were “doctored”. Opinions are very emotionally divided on this subject. There are just too many things out of the realm of acceptable protocol with regard to this case for me to believe that it was as simple as Oswald by himself. I remember the day it happened. I bought a copy of the Warren Report when it was first released and still have it. I have been interested in this and have read everything that I could lay hands on about it. I have associates who are privy to inside info who have made comments both ways. It will be debated for a long time to come,,,emotionally I’m sure.
273 posted on
02/05/2009 12:40:21 PM PST by
Concho
(01-20-2009--The beginning of an ERROR)
To: outofstyle
"I am supposing that the labels were added by someone trying to suggest a front bullet entry. It does not look that way to me." These are poor quality versions. The labels were added by the person using the photos to support their argument. That person says there is a 45 cal wound in the side. None of the doctors said that. I believe this person also has the photos oriented the wrong way.
277 posted on
02/05/2009 3:27:16 PM PST by
mlo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson