No, there is no reason they might be for Coleman but as he says.. all ballots need to be counted not just a selective few.
Besides the fact that Frunken is hot to keep them from being counted says something in itself.
Besides the fact that Frunken is hot to keep them from being counted says something in itself.
Exactly - Franken knows he pulled a fast over Normie, and was trying to run out the clock. Again, the Minnesota Supreme Court massively screwed up by going outside Minnesota statute to allow the campaigns to review rejected absentee ballots and open/count the ballots they agreed were improperly rejected. If they hadn't, Coleman would most likely have been ahead after the recount, and it would be Franken filing the contest.
In this phase, the judges should be reviewing all of the rejected absentee ballots to see which ones were improperly rejected, not just those complained about by one or both sides. The whole point of this process (recount/election challenge) is to try to determine the rightful winner. Shouldn't be counting/reviewing just part of these ballots. Hopefully the state legislature will address this when they revise our election laws.