Why because sometimes it is green and sometimes it is not.
Tthis picture is your proof that haloing or ringing is not proof of photo shoping because we can still see some green pixels between the letters in a couple of areas.....
Watch this....
using a thin pink line I will show the areas effected by the select process vs the areas where the green was unaffected by the placement of the selected text.
The ringing or haloing you are not talking about and weren't trying to disprove is the proof even a novice can see is a perfect example of the type of distortions seen at the pixel level as a result of photoshopping.
Trying to prove that because you can see green in the larger gaps between letters and text only works if you ignore the Obvious and are oblivious to your own findings.
sure the green will show up in open areas but it is those ringed or haloed areas where the photoshopping reveals itself.....
It is to Polarik.
"Tthis picture is your proof that haloing or ringing is not proof of photo shoping because we can still see some green pixels between the letters in a couple of areas....."
No, as I've repeated over and over, I am not trying to prove anything about the ringing.
"sure the green will show up in open areas but it is those ringed or haloed areas where the photoshopping reveals itself....."
Tell it to Polarik. You keep trying to insert your own pet issue into this, *BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT*.
If you want to write up something to prove your theory about the ringing, go right ahead. Just stop trying to insert it into a discussion of something different and act like that's what was being discussed.