No. We are talking about different things. It is not semantics. How many times have I told you this already? Do yourself a favor and go back and read for understanding.
I was responding to one element of Polarik's report. Not yours, his. *Polarik* has specifically said the he does not think the halos are a result of forgery. I'm not addressing the halos. He's talking about something else. So am I.
You have misunderstood this from the begining and despite it being explained numerous times have refused to check yourself. Don't be stubborn, go back and try to understand what was being written.
I’m taking a break if I laugh any harder at you I’ll get a bloody nose.
You have been pure entertainment>
No really you have!
It’s killing me to laugh so hard at anyone so oblivious