No, I'm the one making the point. You still aren't getting what it is.
"...I haven't read Polarik's report and actually refuse to because I don't want it to color my opinions."
There you go. I'm specifically responding to Polarik's claim in his report about missing green pixels. If you haven't read it then you don't know what I'm talking about, but everything I put in that post was about that issue.
"I say that haloing is the best clue that a layman has that something has been done to Obama's CoLB..."
I'm not dealing with the haloing. Polarik doesn't say the haloing is from forgery, he says the supposed missing green pixels are. So you are totally misreading what it is I'm explaining.
You proved my point about haloing totally and conclusitively.
And I thank you for it.
Had it not been for your tireless work to try to disprove that Obama’s CoLB is a forgery I never would have been able to lead you into actually proving what I have said all along.
That the haloing is evidence of a photoshop forgery.
Now unless you have a legitimate explanation for how it occurs naturally from laser printing or scanning I suggest in order for you to save face, you quit exposing your own failure to disprove haloing.
Why do you spend so much time on something you don’t believe? Doesn’t it get boring? You aren’t going to make this go away. A military officer has now filed a lawsuit. GIVE IT UP. Let it play out. Your arguments day after day after day every time someone posts anything on the BC clearly show your agenda. Are you that afraid that your Messiah will be proven to be a liar and a fraud?
Polarik’s report isn’t what will break this case open. It will be the demand to show the original.