Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just filed Obama ineligibility AMICUS CURIAE
http://wthrockmorton.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/joyce_anderson-amicus-final.pdf ^

Posted on 02/03/2009 11:52:39 AM PST by dascallie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-391 next last
To: samtheman
I work in NYC, on the 12th floor of a 20 story building and if I go up to the roof I should be able to see them: thousands and thousands of pigs flying by, belatedly migrating south for the winter.

...each one with a 'One nation - One people - Obama!' bumper sticker stuck to it's pink @ss.

How sad...

101 posted on 02/03/2009 4:13:01 PM PST by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeParty

“Roberts may have fumbled the oath because he knows Twiggy is most likely Kenyan by birth”

That’s just about the silliest thing I’ve ever heard.


102 posted on 02/03/2009 4:14:20 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
"It thus clearly appears that, by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the Crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, the jurisdiction of the English Sovereign, and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign State or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born."

"III. The same rule was in force in all the English Colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the Constitution as originally established."

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)


103 posted on 02/03/2009 4:15:03 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BrerLion

“’If he’s born in the US, his parent’s citizenship doesn’t matter.’

‘That last statement is just plain silly.’”

Are you unfamiliar with the 14th amendment? Or is that what you’re calling “silly”?


104 posted on 02/03/2009 4:15:41 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

.

OBAMA knows he was not born in Hawaii.

Hawaii residents know that after Hawaii Statehood residents there had a several years’ window to have Certificates of Live Birth issued for their kids not born there or in America.

a la OBAMA.

.


105 posted on 02/03/2009 4:19:45 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mlo
I've seen this. Why wasn't this the one released in the first place?

What it proves is that the first one was a fake, so we're supposed to believe that "this one" is the real thing? Why was a fake released in the first place?

African is a race? That would make Theresa Heinz African American just like the chosen one wouldn't it?

106 posted on 02/03/2009 4:32:33 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Obama says we should listen to the muzzies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: mlo

“Why should I stop saying that? It’s true.”

You don’t say? Ok.

Lay it out there. Your whole position, that Obama has “produced” his birth certificate.

Let’s hear it. And while you’re at it, please give the rationale as to why he will not touch the topic by word or deed, to clear up the questions, with a ten foot pole (unlike McCain).

Go ahead. I’m all eyes.


107 posted on 02/03/2009 4:33:59 PM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE

>OBAMA knows he was not born in Hawaii.<

If he knows that, others will too. In that case he is just a charlatan and the American people who voted for him are just a bunch of dupes.

And those who protect him, regardless of their rank in government, are enablers who are as guilty of fraud as he is and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law if it can be confirmed that they are part of the conspiracy to deceive the American people.


108 posted on 02/03/2009 4:36:19 PM PST by 353FMG (The name is Beam, James Beam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: KDD
“It’s a valid Hawaii state birth certificate,” spokesman Janice Okubo said June 13, 2008, after we e-mailed her our copy.

And Okubo, the dingbat, finally admitted about 2 weeks later to the St. Petersburg Times...

Janice Okubo: "I don't know that it's possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents."

All loon and main stream website omit the statement above in bold.

109 posted on 02/03/2009 4:44:15 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: mlo

You never tire of posting that Obama COLB forgery


110 posted on 02/03/2009 4:46:28 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
If you look, it was a direct response to what someone said. It usually is.

And what basis is there for believing it is a forgery?

111 posted on 02/03/2009 4:51:12 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE

Obama has not filed a response in Berg’s appeal. Obama can only rely on his previous defense that Berg does not have standing.

The Amicus Curiae argues Berg’s case should have standing because of “prudential considerations” and “an unprecedented constitutional crisis with civil and military implications.”

Obama’s defense is very limited in scope.


112 posted on 02/03/2009 4:51:29 PM PST by SvenMagnussen (Change is coming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: dascallie
"Lay it out there. Your whole position, that Obama has “produced” his birth certificate."

I posted a photograph of it earlier. Scroll back. Pretending it doesn't exist doesn't make it go away.

And some guy on the internet calling it a forgery doesn't make it so either.

113 posted on 02/03/2009 4:53:09 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron
"What it proves is that the first one was a fake, so we're supposed to believe that "this one" is the real thing? Why was a fake released in the first place?"

No, the first one was a scan. This is a photograph of the same document.

114 posted on 02/03/2009 4:54:33 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Birther ping!

Now that there's funny. I don't care who you are!

115 posted on 02/03/2009 4:55:56 PM PST by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mlo

“This is a photograph of the same document.” ... Prove it. You sedem to be a lot of hat but no cattle.


116 posted on 02/03/2009 4:58:50 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeParty
Great Pretender, indeed. I think of that every time someone tells me,”Obama won, get over it.” He didn't win if he wasn't eligible to play the game. And all that campaign donation money no one will account for. Some body bought themselves a Presidency with a fake dollar bill.
117 posted on 02/03/2009 5:00:00 PM PST by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

My bad.......I was responding to something someone else posted.


118 posted on 02/03/2009 5:02:14 PM PST by stockpirate (A people unwilling to use violent force to defend liberty deserve the tyrants that rule them. SP-09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: mlo

OMG. Are you serious?

THAT is your proof?

The crisp newly generated “COLB”??

Have read even a microdot of information about this very suspect item? Did you read my posts about it?

It has been debunked as a forgery ad naueum, over and over and over and over.

And you keep showing up over and over and over and over repeating the same thing -—regardless—making no reference or counter point to the intense analysis of this forgery—as if you have no ability to assimilate the INFORMATION presented to your critical faculties.

So is this another one of those maddening Obot circular insanity tactics?


119 posted on 02/03/2009 5:14:30 PM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: mlo

Ron Polarik


120 posted on 02/03/2009 5:16:27 PM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-391 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson