Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bluejay

You’re right on that — I did not use the standard definition of “trade war.” What’s been happening has been more subtle.

I don’t know that we’ve benefited. If we trade good paying jobs for cheap goods, that’s not a benefit. Neither is it a benefit to trade very high end exports for manufacturing infrastructure.

I never believed the less than 5% unemployment. During the Clinton administration they started playing around with how unemployment is measured. Things like the birth/death model did not do anything to help the accuracy. The U-6 number seems to be more accurate.


70 posted on 02/02/2009 3:10:25 AM PST by durasell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: durasell

> I don’t know that we’ve benefited. If we trade good paying jobs for cheap goods, that’s not a benefit.

How do you know what kind of jobs were created? Checking GDP, GNP, per capita stats all contradict your statement.

> I never believed the less than 5% unemployment.

Do you have any evidence to support these statements? Without data to back-up these assertions they are meaningless.


71 posted on 02/02/2009 3:18:43 AM PST by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson