Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideminded
I kind of doubt it. The other day Obama/Biden filed a motion to dismiss. It wasn't very long, but in reading it I got the impression that the lawyers who filed it were quite skilled. In comparison most of the anti-Obama filings seem like amateur hour.

A simple motion to dismiss is only the first step for the defense and citing the "factcheck".org address to a jpg document passed off as genuine is not skilled at all. Those "skilled" lawyers should present that Obama COLB to the court, now that might be impressive.

75 posted on 01/31/2009 11:31:12 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel

It is my understanding that the Hi officials has stated that they have a bc on file has anyone wrote the Hi officials and asked if there is a accepted bc on file ?


76 posted on 01/31/2009 11:45:39 AM PST by roylll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel
citing the "factcheck".org address to a jpg document passed off as genuine is not skilled at all.

Getting away with it is. They did cite all sorts of case law to back up their position, so maybe they will.

The thing that confuses me is this: The photos on factcheck appear to me to at least show a genuine Hawaiian certification document. (I don't buy the forgery arguments.) But why wouldn't Obama's lawyers be given a copy of it. Perhaps they would have to show it to the judge in open court to make their point, whereas they are hoping to arrange a dismissal without a hearing.

81 posted on 01/31/2009 12:39:21 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson