[TXnMA]

On FR, (and in most polite discourse) it is considered a courtesy to include someone when you talk about them or what they have said. It was you, GodGunsGuts who posted this deceptive article from a YEC website -- and now you consider those who politely respond to it -- and your absurd defense of it -- as "stalking" you -- when they show you the courtesy of including you in the discourse?

FYI, "stalking" is defined as following another FReeper from thread-to thread -- and attacking them with comments that are non sequiturs re that new thread.

"Stalking" IS NOT merely continuing (politely, I might add) a discussion on a subject on which you solicited comment -- by posting it as an article!

"Baiting and Whining" is not an acceptable FR strategy.

Oh, FYI, I acted on your suggestion...

[TXnMA]

See #318. While I was composing #319 online, our AM was taking action...

[GodGunsGuts]

It is stalking when I tell the liar “for” Jesus to get lost THREE TIMES. I don’t take kindly to liars, especially when they claim to be speaking for God.

Tell me TX, do you always stand up for liars just because you happen to agree with them? If I catch someone lying on my side, I expect them to make a full and complete apology. But if it is your policy to stand up for liars like DallasMike, then I can only assume that you approve of such things.