After reading several AGW papers of those who have been labeled skeptics I have personally come to the conclusion that AGW is bunk. I came to that conclusion from what I term “sincere” science presented to me from various sources whose data disagrees significantly with the propaganda that Mr. Hansen has been spewing.
“You were the one that, by dancing around my first question, (and now this one) asserted that any agreement with ANTI-religious belief equals “honest, sincere, objective”...”
Your chop-logic is limp and pointless.
If you have nothing better to do than make asinine assumptions such as:
“If you’re going to go on demanding Christians and their ideas be be kept out of science class, or any public enterprise for that matter, the least you could do is explain why your position is more beneficial to science, or is somehow the right path to take, etc.”
I will no longer feel a need to respond to your posts.
I see.
So “fundamentalists hijacking science” is “dishonest” and “impure”, while godless liberals hijacking science to suit their ideological ends get a complete free pass and is of no significance or consequence to you.
I got that from your first response but thanks for clarifying.