Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beckysueb

Or better yet in 2002 when Liberal Democrats decided it was a good idea to inject divisive politics into the mainstream and then spent the next several years dividing America as much as they humanly could. That would have been the best time to do it.


20 posted on 01/30/2009 9:32:44 AM PST by Danae (Amerikan Unity My Ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Danae

The division began in the mid-1990s when, after the failure that was Clinton’s first year and losing congress to the Republican “revolution”, he succesfully convinced the voting public that talk radio was to blame for the OKC bombing and that those who wanted to limit the powers of government were “antigovernment anarchists” who posed the single greatest threat to America.

He was on his way to being a one term president. OKC turned that around for him.

Hillary blamed her scandals on a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.

The nation was divided and it was the Clintons who did the dividing.


23 posted on 01/30/2009 9:56:39 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Obama thinks spending tax $ on abortions in Mexico helps more than controlling illegal immigration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Danae
then spent the next several years dividing America as much as they humanly could.

Yes, and blaming Bush for the devisiveness.

34 posted on 01/30/2009 11:19:18 PM PST by beckysueb (Palin/Jindahl in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson