Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea scraps all accords with South (won't recognize border over Yellwo Sea)
Reuters ^ | 01/30/09 | Jonathan Thatcher

Posted on 01/29/2009 6:45:47 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster

North Korea scraps all accords with South

By Jonathan Thatcher

1 hr 51 mins ago

SEOUL (Reuters) – North Korea said on Friday it was scrapping all accords with the South, the latest in a series of verbal attacks on its neighbor that analysts say are more aimed at grabbing the attention of new U.S. President Barack Obama.

One analyst said the latest rise in tension increased the chances of a military clash on the heavily armed border that has divided the two Koreas for more than half a century.

"There is neither way to improve (relations) nor hope to bring them on track," North Korea's KCNA news agency quoted the Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of Korea as saying.

Tension had reached "such extremes" that "inter-Korean relations have reached the brink of a war," KCNA said, using a phrase commonly carried by North Korean state media.

South Korean officials were not immediately available for comment.

Friday's threat focused largely on a basic accord the two Koreas struck in 1991 that analysts said Pyongyang might feel inadequately reflects its position on disputed ocean waters.

Other deals were reached during a brief period of detente that followed a summit between the leaders of North and South Korea in June 2000, which led to reunions of separated families, communication systems to defuse military tensions and rail and road links across their heavily armed border.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nkorea; nll; provocation; skorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
This is a prelude to provocation in Yellow Sea. Previously, their rhetoric has never reached the level of scrapping border agreement.

Obviously, they hope that S. Korea caves to this threat, but if SK doesn't, they will follow up with their (military) response. This is not the usual bombastic rhetoric this time around. Still, I don't see any reason to cave to them.

There will be no fishing in this area for some time, though. By the way, this is also a way of indirectly pressuring U.S. to reach any kind of deal, even if it is lopsidedly in NK's favor. Obama is set to send to N. Korea U.S. delegation made up of former diplomats. NK notched up the tension just in time.

1 posted on 01/29/2009 6:45:48 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; nw_arizona_granny; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 01/29/2009 6:46:21 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

0bama is in office now. There is no incentive of NK to behave.


3 posted on 01/29/2009 6:48:14 PM PST by Islander7 (LOST TAGLINE - If found, please return. LARGE Reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
How much has to do with the new government in the South, to do with the power struggle invisibly going on in the North, and just how much has to do with O's sweetness and light initiative???
4 posted on 01/29/2009 6:55:07 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
NK notched up the tension just in time.

Notwithstanding inter-Korean politics, don't you think this is aimed at Obama, designed to elicit a response and thus provide some measure of how he may react to a serious provocation?

5 posted on 01/29/2009 6:55:36 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Well now:


US official: NKorea will challenge Obama

By FOSTER KLUG,
Associated Press Writer –
Wed Jan 7, 1:39 pm ET

WASHINGTON – The Bush administration said Wednesday that nuclear-armed North Korea will be an early test for President-elect Barack Obama’s new administration, conceding that one of President George W. Bush’s top foreign policy initiatives is unlikely to be resolved before Obama takes office Jan. 20.
Bush’s national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, said the long-running, often acrimonious and currently stalled nuclear disarmament talks among the Koreas, the United States, Japan, China and Russia have allowed envoys to pressure the North to follow through on its 2007 agreement to give up its nuclear program in return for aid and concessions.
But “North Korea will test the new administration by once again trying to split the six parties and renegotiate the deal, he said in a speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank.

(cut)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090107/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_nkorea


6 posted on 01/29/2009 6:55:37 PM PST by shoutingandpointing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I bet every tin-horn dictator is going to challenge our tin-horn president.


7 posted on 01/29/2009 6:59:44 PM PST by Nachoman (Think of life as an adventure you don't survive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7
Whose obwana?
8 posted on 01/29/2009 7:00:02 PM PST by GSP.FAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

SCENARIO- North announces it will invade South Korea to ‘unify’ the country under its legitimate rule.

Obama says OK and orders the 28,000 US troops to stay in the barracks after making a deal that they would be repatriated to America in exchange for recognition and aid.


9 posted on 01/29/2009 7:01:00 PM PST by GeronL (Had the flu. Not well yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

well, yeah, ya think?


10 posted on 01/29/2009 7:01:45 PM PST by GeronL (Had the flu. Not well yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
All of the above. First, N. Korea misjudged the SK political situation in last presidential election. They thought SK would have another appeasing government and get uninterrupted aid on NK's terms. It turned out to be wrong.

Because of that, the entire line of officials responsible for SK affairs were purged. Now hardliners are in charge. Kim Jong-il himself has turned hardline.

Inside N. Korea, Kim Jong-il has a race against clock to put his regime on secure footing and pass baton to next generation. Economically and politically, NK has a lot of problem domestically. N. Korea needs to rein on them by creating external conflict.

Kim Jong-il is anxious to reach a grand deal to settle everything and normalize diplomatic relation with U.S. and want U.S. to sponsor NK as 'a normal country.' This will turn NK as a legitimate country in E. Asia. Most likely a country with nukes. This is a legacy he wants to leave behind. It would be billed as a justification for his totalitarian rule.

Currently, Obama is more pliant and S. Korea's stance is more hardened than previous two administrations. Kim Jong-il wants to pick a fight to cow S. Korea with the help of Zero, by dangling a carrot in front of Zero.

11 posted on 01/29/2009 7:07:30 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The Chinese puppet provokes Obama


12 posted on 01/29/2009 7:08:57 PM PST by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“By the way, this is also a way of indirectly pressuring U.S. to reach any kind of deal...”

This IS a message to us, as well as to the South. That’s the reason for all the bluster, not just from NK but all over the world. All the scum of the earth are trying to push the envelope with the new administration, hoping that we will give and that they can advance their agendas. Sadly, they may be right.


13 posted on 01/29/2009 7:09:00 PM PST by tanuki (Summum ius summa injuria. (The more law, the less justice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanuki
Chances are that they would gang up on Obama more or less simultaneously, stretching him really thin.
14 posted on 01/29/2009 7:10:48 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“Chances are that they would gang up on Obama more or less simultaneously, stretching him really thin.”

My hunch too(sigh).


15 posted on 01/29/2009 7:30:58 PM PST by tanuki (Summum ius summa injuria. (The more law, the less justice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Not to worry, Obama will sit down with them, explain things clearly, and they will stop bickering with the South Koreans.


16 posted on 01/29/2009 7:36:04 PM PST by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Great timing, and probably a good plan. (on their part) I’m sure O will concede something to them to bring them back to the status-quo. The world’s despots are going to play O like a cheap violin.


17 posted on 01/29/2009 8:11:10 PM PST by CodeMasterPhilzar (I love my Country, but I now genuinely fear my government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeMasterPhilzar; TigerLikesRooster; JimSEA
Agree that 0's foreign team is weak and will get tested thoroughly.
In your opinion, one big push or multiple ramped-up actions?
Maybe in diverse areas of the world by groups with a common agenda?
18 posted on 01/29/2009 8:20:53 PM PST by Tainan (Where's my FOF Indicator?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tainan
Countries with close ties to N. Korea:
Iran, Syria, and Pakistan.

Iran - long military cooperation, including military training, missile development, and possible cooperation in nuclear weapons

Syria - long military trade/cooperation in chemical weapons, missiles, and nuclear weapons(a site bombed in 2007 by Israelis)

Pakistan - close cooperation in missile and nuclear weapons.

Current conflict in Mid-East — proxies of Iran and Syria, Hizbulla/Hamas against Israel

Pakistan — potential military conflict with India, or within tribal area bordering Afghanistan

These conflict could light up along with N. Korean provocations. Since they have long-standing contact, their actions are easily coordinated if they choose to.

19 posted on 01/29/2009 8:29:43 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I think they also sense that there is enough on Barry’s plate in the mid-East where he is already sending representatives. I think that they believe he cannot handle more than one full plate at a time and will let North Korea slide, and they may be correct. South Korea is going to have to step up to the plate this time. Any of that plausible?


20 posted on 01/29/2009 9:00:22 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson