Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I still don’t follow the ‘logical explanation’...he was cold, so he turned up the thermostat, and then he took his coat off because he was hot?

It would be ‘logical’ tu just leave the thermostat alone and leave the coat on.

I think a more ‘logical’ explanation would be that he doesn’t like wearing a coat, and doesn’t seem to believe that the position requires wearing a coat.

The fawning media are bordering on Pravda stupid.


28 posted on 01/29/2009 8:47:20 AM PST by lacrew (Where's Blago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lacrew
"and doesn’t seem to believe that the position requires wearing a coat"

Let's hope that it requires wearing trousers!

48 posted on 01/29/2009 9:05:58 AM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: lacrew

He sure thought it was logical when he went bowling with his coat and tie.


58 posted on 01/29/2009 9:49:44 AM PST by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson