Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

F-35 to arrive at Shaw in 2017
The Item ^ | January 29, 2009 | EMMA RATLIFF

Posted on 01/29/2009 7:29:27 AM PST by Jet Jaguar

During the Greater Sumter Chamber of Commerce’s annual retreat this year attendees were given an in depth briefing by both Lt. Gen. Gary L. North of the U.S. Air Force and Charlie Savage, regional manager of Lockheed Martin, on the latest happenings at Shaw Air Force base and more specifically, the latest arrival date and progress update of the F-35 Lightning II joint strike fighter to Shaw.

During the third day of the retreat held in Myrtle Beach, North, commander with the 9th Air Force, updated local business leaders on the status of the F-35 fighter, also known as AF-1, noting that the jet “is scheduled to deliver (to Shaw) in 2017.”

The fifth-generation aircraft will replace the fourth-generation F-16 and holds a hefty price tag of almost $80 million.

“There will be a release of the noise analysis that should be announced in March,” said Savage, who is based at Shaw Air Force Base.

Savage and North discussed upgrades that the aircraft will incorporate, such as stealth capability throughout the aircraft, including embedded antennas, aligned edges and special coatings and materials. The fighter will also conduct air-to-air and air-to-ground combat missions simultaneously.

Not only will the F-35 fighter’s capacity be upgraded, but construction and maintenance of the aircraft will be handled differently than that of the F-16. According to a release from Lockheed Martin, the manufacturer, “The AF-1, the first F-35 to have employed the moving assembly line at its full-rate production speed of 50 inches (127 millimeters) per hour … . The moving assembly line, designed to improve production quality and speed, is the first ever for a modern fighter. AF-1 becomes the first aircraft since World War II to use a moving assembly line at Lockheed Martin’s (formerly Consolidated Vultee, Convair and General Dynamics) Fort Worth factory.”

Also, according to Lockheed Martin, the F-35 will incorporate an “advanced aircraft sustainment, ‘maintenance’ concept, which not only employs built-in diagnostics to quickly identify the cause of malfunctioning parts so that the aircraft can be returned to service faster than in the past, but it also employs a prognostics concept that monitors all key components to assess their life expectancy so that maintenance personel can better predict failures, replace parts before they fail and better manage recources and time.”

At this point, Lockheed Martin is promoting the F-35 as “truly a generation apart from the F-16 due to advancements in technology and by meeting the demands of intensity in the battle space, scarcity of time and the demand of instantaneous interoperability, ‘fusion.’”

Lockheed Martin’s first successful F-35 flight took place on Dec. 15, 2006, at the facility in Fort Worth, Texas. Delivery of the aircraft to the armed services will not begin until 2010.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f35; shawafb; sumter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 01/29/2009 7:29:27 AM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Nice, 17 years after the demonstrator first flew, over a decade after the first real model flew.


2 posted on 01/29/2009 7:31:11 AM PST by Travis T. OJustice (Change is not a destination, just as hope is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice

Good thing the program was fast-tracked.


3 posted on 01/29/2009 7:36:17 AM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

prognostics concept = “Dave, I’ve just picked up a fault in the AE-35 unit.”


4 posted on 01/29/2009 7:36:23 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Confidential to MSM: "Better Red than Read" is a failed business model.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

ping.


5 posted on 01/29/2009 7:39:50 AM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice

By the time these are operational and deployed (in inadequate numbers), the technology will require significant overhaul.

I am in awe of how fast we generated aircraft during WWII.


6 posted on 01/29/2009 7:41:01 AM PST by Never on my watch ( We need people in office who make their reputation by earning money - not spending it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

7 posted on 01/29/2009 7:41:54 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 10 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

8 posted on 01/29/2009 7:42:00 AM PST by meandog (The two named Bush get the bird from this hand!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

If Barky doesn’t cancel it as being “too costly.” It would cut into our ability to bail everyone out. Everyone but Lockheed Martin. He will want the Chinese to buy them out.


9 posted on 01/29/2009 7:42:03 AM PST by Right Wing Assault (What's Obama's Secret?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Remember when American industry could run-up a brand new fighter from drawing board to prototype to full-scale production in the tens of thousands in about 9 months?


10 posted on 01/29/2009 7:42:26 AM PST by AngryJawa (Obama's Success is America's Failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Never on my watch

Or Kelly Johnson’s skunk works. Good stuff!


11 posted on 01/29/2009 7:42:54 AM PST by Travis T. OJustice (Change is not a destination, just as hope is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa
Remember when American industry could run-up a brand new fighter from drawing board to prototype to full-scale production in the tens of thousands in about 9 months?

Having Hitler and Tojo knocking at the door provided sufficient motivation - today we take lots of time to make sure the pork gets distributed to the "right" people.

12 posted on 01/29/2009 7:51:23 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("One man's 'magic' is another man's engineering. 'Supernatural' is a null word." -- Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa
“Remember when American industry could run-up a brand new fighter from drawing board to prototype to full-scale production in the tens of thousands in about 9 months?”

NO. Can you? If so, you're pretty darn old!
(Even in WWII it took longer than that.)

13 posted on 01/29/2009 7:59:28 AM PST by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( The Constitution needs No interpreting, only APPLICATION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa

“Remember when American industry could run-up a brand new fighter from drawing board to prototype to full-scale production in the tens of thousands in about 9 months?”

Well, let’s be honest here. The P-51 Mustang was a lot simpler fighter plane than the F-35 — no computers, no exotic materials, no interoperability requirements, simple structure, etc. The cause of these long lead times is the fact that everything is so complicated. These modern fighter planes so complex, it is amazing they work at all.


14 posted on 01/29/2009 7:59:49 AM PST by Londo Molari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

2017? Thats coming in way late


15 posted on 01/29/2009 8:17:20 AM PST by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1

I thought so too. 2011 was the last report.


16 posted on 01/29/2009 8:19:40 AM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Londo Molari
I'm not saying that producing an F-35 from scratch should take only 9 months. OTOH, it shouldn't take 20 years either.

They are obviously much more complicated, etc. But then again, our engineering and production capabilities are worlds more sophisticated than they were in 1944.

If one follows the money (which is always instructive), one would be pretty tempted to conclude the aerospace manufacturers were making an everlasting meal out of the project at the taxpayers expense, no?

17 posted on 01/29/2009 8:26:43 AM PST by AngryJawa (Obama's Success is America's Failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice

I don’t think they are going to be the first base to get them.


18 posted on 01/29/2009 8:27:40 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa
Remember when American industry could run-up a brand new fighter from drawing board to prototype to full-scale production in the tens of thousands in about 9 months?

That was back when the plane went obsolete and was replaced within 4 years.
19 posted on 01/29/2009 8:29:17 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa
They are obviously much more complicated, etc. But then again, our engineering and production capabilities are worlds more sophisticated than they were in 1944.

More 'sophisticated' does not mean faster. Back then aircraft testing was only one step better than 'lets wip one up and see if it does not crash when we try it'. If you study those times you will also see that for every sucessful fighter like they P-51 there were almost a dozen failed programs that never flew or were failures when they did fly. There are a lot of ways the modern programs are not efficient (I should get back to work) but comparing them to the programs of the 40's is apples and oranges.
20 posted on 01/29/2009 8:34:26 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson