To: George from New England
Does he get his money back from the pharmacy? He still got the drugs and likely got the benefit of their use, so why should he get his money back?
To: Publius Valerius
He still got the drugs and likely got the benefit of their use, so why should he get his money back?
This statement is the apex of ignorance. Did you read the article? Or even the response to the article? The drugs were used to treat a condition that the drugs were not meant to treat. How the heck does he "benefit"? That's the point of the suit -- that the drugs were marketed off-label for ailments they are not designed to treat. So all the patients get is the horrible side effects with no benefits. So, yeah, you can bet on the coattails of this lawsuit, there will be a lot more coming down the pike.
26 posted on
01/28/2009 9:20:37 AM PST by
bdeaner
(The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson