Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NavVet

You say tomato, I say ta-mah-toe.

The fact is, there was a deliberate media bias *against* candidates like Brownback, Hunter, Tancredo, etc., and the media buzz over Thompson worked to keep those conservatives out of the spotlight, and Thompson in it.

Not only did the media choose the GOP candidate, the GOP nudged and winked at the media all the way, by allowing Democrats to cross over in Republican primaries which certainly worked to the disadvantage of ANY conservative candidate, and to the advantage of the pathetic sell-out RINOs, specifically the one who gave it up for 0bama last November 4th.

Primary politics are like NFL football, on any given Sunday, any team can beat any other team, given all the variables and possibilities.

I maintain that it could have turned out much differently.


157 posted on 01/27/2009 6:05:41 PM PST by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American History. Barack 0bama is his second term.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: mkjessup

True, the media mantra “no fire in the belly” was as effective against Thompson as the “I can see Russia from my house” routine was in driving Palin’s numbers down.
Unfortunately, I think now that the media has totally abandon all pretense of objectivity, we can’t buy enough air time to compete with the free advertising that they are going to give to lefties and RINOs.


190 posted on 01/27/2009 9:46:09 PM PST by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it to defend in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson