Your script is simple: X doesnt agree with me 100% therefore X is evil/bad/wrong/too liberal. So you attack X.
Never mind that X may be a good conservative or a center-right influence in a good direction overall and/or a lesser issue than O, the real dangerous / liberal force in America.
You constantly ignore the larger threats. Why? You are afraid to attack real liberals, like Pelosi, Obama, etc. Maybe you are a troll (nope) or you just don’t get how real political strategy works (Reagan rule - a guy who agrees with me 80% is an ally not a traitor) or maybe you just cant do the big leagues so do the pipsqueak Trotskyite splitter stuff (big fish in small pond syndrome). Whatever the reason, the result is predictable. You end up harming and dividing the cause.
Your actions of division against other conservatives are destructive and harmful to the conservative cause. You accuse Babbin falsely and blame him for things he is no more responsible for than you are (hmm, there’s an idea, maybe we can blame you for 2008 elections, it makes no less sense than blaming Babbin.)
Thus, you are engaged in precisely what you claim to oppose.
Enjoy your coterie of circular firing squad extremists and the other destructive forces who are going to do nothing to help restore this country, and who will subtly but surely empower the continued move to the left.
Your words betray you, and are actually quite illustrative of exactly what I'm talking about.
Sorry WOSG, but this mindset is exactly the problem. In a game of compromise, evil always wins.