We’ve fixed these false predictions
Ad hominem
The brush off
Falsificationism is flawed
If there are so many problems evolution would have been toppled
Those quoted believe in evolution
These falsifications will be remedied in the future
There is no better alternative
No one believes these predictions anymore
Sounds like 99% of hte ‘scientific counter-arguments’ presented here on FR everytime a scientific article brings to light the impossibilities of Macroevolution- Recall the mathematical statistics articles? “Mathematics doesn’t apply because it’s ‘linear’ and evolution isn’t linear’ (This ‘counter-argument’ was shown to be silly- but it still persists for some reason) “Thermodynamics doesn’t apply because the second law only applies to closed systems” (DESPITE the fact that the second law is even WORSE for open systems- this ‘coutner-argument’ still persists for some reason) “ID is a religion” “ID is psuedoscience” “Creationists are ignorant of ‘real’ science” ID’ers have to sign statmeents of faith- thus proving it’s religion” (Apparently implying that all ID’ers must sign statmeents of faith- somethign that is simply contrary to the FACTS, and despite hte FACT that those statements that a FEW MIGHT sign, is totally irrelevent to the scientific evidneces which EXPOSE the problems with naturalism)
It’s sad what represents counter-arguments to ID issues these days- yet soem insist on doing practically every one of htose bullet points above- apparently thinking it somehow constitutes sound counter-arguments.
Yep, that pretty much sums it up. For some reason the Evos just can’t face the fact that neo-Darwinian evolution is collapsing like a house of cards, whereas the arguments for Creation/ID keep getting stronger and stronger. This behavior also strengthens the argument that they are clinging to the NDToE out of religious conviction, not science.