Skip to comments.
Darwin’s Predictions (falsified)
Darwin's Predictions ^
| Cornelius G. Hunter, Ph.D
Posted on 01/26/2009 9:13:21 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-242 next last
To: BroJoeK; metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; GourmetDan; ...
Excellent, excellent, excellent!!!
To: GodGunsGuts
3
posted on
01/26/2009 9:17:09 AM PST
by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Be prepared for tough times. FReepmail me to learn about our new survival thread!)
To: GodGunsGuts
The survival of the fittest is behind the liberal mantra of meritocracy, but their social programs do everything to promote socialism and prop up the least resourceful and least productive in society.
The liberals say that they believe in man made better by men, but they promote the most base vices that undermine the best in men.
4
posted on
01/26/2009 9:23:11 AM PST
by
madinmadtown
(BO stinks..)
To: GodGunsGuts
More anti-science nonsense from the Dishonesty Institute.
Apparently science is now forbidden to modify its theories when new data come to light.
5
posted on
01/26/2009 9:32:39 AM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: GodGunsGuts
6
posted on
01/26/2009 9:35:34 AM PST
by
RaceBannon
(We have sown the wind, but we will reap the whirlwind. NObama. Not my president.)
To: Coyoteman
When just about every facet of a given “theory” fails to predict, it’s time to scrap the theory and come up with another one. And no, it is not necessary to keep the falsified theory in place until a new theory can be formulated.
To: GodGunsGuts
Look out, GGG!!!
The rabid darwinists are out today; it won't be long before they're frothing and snarling here!!
LOL!
8
posted on
01/26/2009 9:36:51 AM PST
by
ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY
( The Constitution needs No interpreting, only APPLICATION!)
To: GodGunsGuts
Still can’t find Cornelius’ references to Darwin’s ideas about DNA. I suppose I’ll have to search some more.
However Cornelius did acknowledge that Darwin lived 150 years ago. A striking admission from a creationist.
To: GodGunsGuts
Evolution predicts that species don’t get poofed into existence in conflict with the laws of nature already observed. We’ll keep watching, but until the prediction is proved false, evolution still stands as the best theory.
10
posted on
01/26/2009 9:44:53 AM PST
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: GodGunsGuts
To: Moonman62
Evolution predicts The Psychic Friends Network has a better track record than Evolutionists.
The Theory Of Evolution is a joke. Always has been.
12
posted on
01/26/2009 9:51:55 AM PST
by
Cedric
To: GodGunsGuts
When just about every facet of a given theory fails to predict, its time to scrap the theory and come up with another one. And no, it is not necessary to keep the falsified theory in place until a new theory can be formulated. Give up a successful scientific theory in place of religious belief which relies on revelation instead of evidence? Is that what you're preaching?
13
posted on
01/26/2009 9:54:54 AM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: GodGunsGuts
Maybe
here. At least he makes a lot of money selling books.
To: GodGunsGuts
So transparent even a thoughful caveman knows the difference.
"Nog say.......Warning! This is a Meta-article that contains
no site-specific scientifc data or research whatsoever
and is produced by a member of an obscure, unrecognized, non-scientific
internet group attempting to pass off his agenda as scholarly.
Buyer Beware!"
15
posted on
01/26/2009 9:57:55 AM PST
by
DoctorMichael
(Creationists on the internet: The Ignorant, amplifying the Stupid.)
To: Coyoteman
a successful scientific theory Piltdown Man
Nebraska Man
Lucy
Archaeoraptor
Etc., etc., etc., etc......
16
posted on
01/26/2009 10:01:40 AM PST
by
Cedric
To: GodGunsGuts
Very interesting, though also very long.
Someone needs to something similar with Anthropogenic Global Warming.
17
posted on
01/26/2009 10:02:40 AM PST
by
expatpat
To: Coyoteman
Obviously you didn’t read “Darwin’s Predictions.” Darwood’s theory has been so utterly falsified that to call it successful is an insult to the very meaning of success.
To: Coyoteman
Please Coyteman, educate us. What makes the theory “successful”? Good PR? The high number of Kool-Aid drinkers like you? I also like how you automatically assume those who dispute the validity of evolution as relying on “religious belief” and “revelation instead of evidence”. That disputes none of the facts, but hey it was a really good argument anyway! </sarc> Prove evolution is true, if you can, but you still won’t be able to disprove the existence of God. While we’re at it, can you tell us one thing about evolution that has been proved true?
19
posted on
01/26/2009 10:04:49 AM PST
by
Red Reign
(Storm clouds gather. Fear not, it's a Red Reign that's coming.)
To: GodGunsGuts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-242 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson